Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Mar 30, 2020
Date Accepted: Jun 4, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Patient Portal Implementation and Uptake: Qualitative Comparative Case Study

Avdagovska M, Ballermann M, Olson K, Graham T, Menon D, Stafinski T

Patient Portal Implementation and Uptake: Qualitative Comparative Case Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(7):e18973

DOI: 10.2196/18973

PMID: 32716308

PMCID: 7427986

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Of course I want it, but it needs to fit my needs: A qualitative comparative case study on barriers and facilitators of a patient portal implementation and uptake

  • Melita Avdagovska; 
  • Mark Ballermann; 
  • Karin Olson; 
  • Timothy Graham; 
  • Devidas Menon; 
  • Tania Stafinski

ABSTRACT

Background:

Giving patients access to their health information is a provincial and national goal and critical to the delivery of patient centered care. With this shift, patient portals have become more prevalent. In Alberta, Alberta Health Services piloted a portal (MyChart). There was a need to identify factors that promoted use of this portal. Furthermore, it was imperative to understand why there was a variability in uptake within the various clinics that participated in the pilot.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to identify potential factors that could improve the uptake of MyChart, from the perspectives of both users and non-users at the pilot sites. We focused on factors that promoted the use of MyChart, along with related benefits, and barriers to its use with the intention that this information could be incorporated into the plan for its province-wide implementation.

Methods:

A qualitative comparative case study was conducted to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and initial perceptions of users and to identify ways to increase uptake prior to province-wide deployment. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 56 participants (27 patients, 21 providers, 4 non-medical staff, and 4 clinic managers) from 5 clinics. Patients were asked about the impact of MyChart on their health and health care. Providers were questioned about the impact on the patient/provider relationship and workflow. Managers were asked about barriers to implementation. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and entered into NVivo. A thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.

Results:

Overall, we identified enablers and barriers combined across all groups. The enablers focused on having access to medical information, being informed, direct communication, ease of usage, and workflow. The barriers were lack of training and education, culture change, and lack of policies and procedures for usage. Similarities were noted between all the groups. Many enablers were barriers as well. Patients stated that MyChart has had a positive impact on their care and they would not want to see this system removed. Providers understood the importance, but stated that not all patients would benefit and it was an add-on to their workflow. For managers, it was about efficiency, innovation, and providing new ways for patients to manage complex chronic conditions.

Conclusions:

The findings build on the identified need around understanding if there is a link between patient portal implementation and patient portal adoptions. Our study demonstrated a direct correlation between implementation, enrollment, and adoption. Furthermore, the enablers and barriers will be essential to policy development regarding patient portals.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Avdagovska M, Ballermann M, Olson K, Graham T, Menon D, Stafinski T

Patient Portal Implementation and Uptake: Qualitative Comparative Case Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(7):e18973

DOI: 10.2196/18973

PMID: 32716308

PMCID: 7427986

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.