Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Mar 29, 2020
Date Accepted: Oct 9, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Impact Evaluation of the Kenya Frontline Field Epidemiology Training Program: Repeated-Measures Study

Ransom J

Impact Evaluation of the Kenya Frontline Field Epidemiology Training Program: Repeated-Measures Study

JMIR Med Educ 2021;7(1):e18956

DOI: 10.2196/18956

PMID: 33416507

PMCID: 7822718

Impact Evaluation of the Kenya Frontline Field Epidemiology Training Program

  • James Ransom

ABSTRACT

Background:

In 2014, Kenya’s field epidemiology and laboratory training program (FELTP) initiated a 3-month-long field-based frontline training (FETP-F) for local public health workers.

Objective:

The objective of our study was to measure the effect of FETP-F on participant workplace practices regarding quality and consistency of public health data, critical interaction with public health data, and improvements in complete and on time reporting.

Methods:

Between February and April 2017, FELTP conducted a mixed-methods evaluation to examine outcomes achieved among 2014 and 2015 graduates of the trainings. Data quality assessment (DQA) and data consistency assessment (DCA) scores, on-time-reporting (OTR) percentages, and ratings of the training experience were the quantitative measures tracked from baseline and then at 6-month intervals up to 18 months post-completion of the training. The qualitative component consisted of semi-structured face-to-face interviews and observations. Quantitative data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Qualitative data were transcribed and analyzed to identify key themes and dimensions.

Results:

One hundred and three graduates were included. For the qualitative component, we reached saturation after 19 onsite interviews and observation exercises. ANOVA showed that the trainings had small but significant impacts on mean DQA and OTR scores. Results showed an insignificant increase in mean DCA scores. Qualitative analyses showed that 68% of respondents acquired new skills, 83% applied those skills to their day-to-day work, and 91% improved work methods.

Conclusions:

The findings show that FETP-F is effective in improving work methods, facilitating behavior change, and improving key public health competencies.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ransom J

Impact Evaluation of the Kenya Frontline Field Epidemiology Training Program: Repeated-Measures Study

JMIR Med Educ 2021;7(1):e18956

DOI: 10.2196/18956

PMID: 33416507

PMCID: 7822718

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.