Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Mar 11, 2020
Date Accepted: Jun 11, 2020
Emotional transition to Fukushima relating Fukushima Nuclear Power Station Accident – How rumors made people’s attitude: Sentiment Analysis
ABSTRACT
Background:
Public interest in radiation rose after the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident was caused by an earthquake off the Pacific coast of Tohoku on March 11, 2011. Various reports on the accident and radiation were spread by the mass media, and people displayed their emotional reactions on Twitter, Facebook, and other social networking sites, which were thought to be related to information about the Fukushima accident, and fears about radiation were spread, leading to harmful rumors about Fukushima and the refusal to test children for radiation. It is believed that identifying the process by which people emotionally responded to this information and hence became gripped by an increased aversion to Fukushima might be useful in risk communication when similar disasters and accidents occur in future. There are few studies surveying how people feel about radiation in Fukushima and other regions in an unbiased form.
Objective:
The purpose of this study is to identify how the feelings of local residents toward radiation have changed according to Twitter.
Methods:
We used approximately 19 million tweets in Japanese containing the words “radiation” (放射線), “radioactivity” (放射能), and “radioactive substances” (放射性物質) that were posted to Twitter over a one-year period following the Fukushima nuclear accident. We used regional identifiers contained in tweets (nouns, proper nouns, place names, postal codes, and telephone numbers) to categorize them according to their prefecture, and then analyzed the feelings toward those prefectures from the semantic orientation of the words contained in individual tweets (positive impressions or negative impressions).
Results:
Overall, tweets about radiation have decreased, and feelings about radiation have positively trended. We determined that on average, tweets associating Fukushima Prefecture with radiation show more positive feelings than those about other prefectures, but have negatively trended over time. We also found that as other tweets have positively trended, only bots and retweets about Fukushima Prefecture have negatively trended.
Conclusions:
The number of tweets about radiation has decreased overall, and feelings about radiation have positively trended . However, the fact that tweets about Fukushima Prefecture negatively trended, despite decreasing in percentage, which suggests that negative feelings toward Fukushima Prefecture have become more extreme. We found that while the bots and retweets that were not about Fukushima Prefecture gradually trended toward positive feelings, the bots and retweets about Fukushima Prefecture trended toward negative feelings. These results strongly suggest that an aversion toward Fukushima has increased as a result of the negative feelings toward Fukushima Prefecture concerning radiation as spread by bots and retweets.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.