Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics
Date Submitted: Mar 6, 2020
Date Accepted: Jun 13, 2020
Role of artificial intelligence in patient safety outcomes: a systematic literature review
ABSTRACT
Background:
Artificial intelligence (AI) provides opportunities to identify the health risks of patients and thus influence patient safety outcomes.
Objective:
The purpose of this systematic literature review is to identify and analyze quantitative studies utilizing or integrating AI to address and report clinical level patient safety outcomes.
Methods:
We restricted our search to PubMed, PMC, and Web of Science databases to analyze research articles published in English between 2009 and August 2019. We focused on quantitative studies that reported positive, negative, or intermediate changes in patient safety outcomes using AI applications specifically machine learning algorithms and natural language processing. Quantitative research reporting only AI performance but not its influence on patient safety outcomes were excluded from further review.
Results:
We identified 53 eligible studies, which we summarized with respect to their patient safety sub-categories, the most frequently used AI, and reported performance metrics. Identified safety subcategories are clinical alarms (n=9; mostly decision tree models used), clinical report (n=21; support vector machine used), and drug safety (n=23; mostly decision tree models used).
Conclusions:
The systematic review indicated that AI-enabled decision support systems, when implemented properly, can aid in uplifting patient safety by improving error detection, patient stratification, and drug management. Future work is still needed for robust validation of these systems in prospective and real-world clinical environments to understand how well AI can predict safety outcomes in health care settings.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.