Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Mar 5, 2020
Date Accepted: Oct 26, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Perspectives of Patients, Health Care Professionals, and Developers Toward Blockchain-Based Health Information Exchange: Qualitative Study

Lee K, Lim K, Jung SY, Ji H, Hong K, Hwang H, Lee HY

Perspectives of Patients, Health Care Professionals, and Developers Toward Blockchain-Based Health Information Exchange: Qualitative Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(11):e18582

DOI: 10.2196/18582

PMID: 33185553

PMCID: 7695529

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Different perspectives of patients, healthcare professionals, and developers towards blockchain-based health information exchange: A qualitative research

  • Keehyuck Lee; 
  • Kahyun Lim; 
  • Se Young Jung; 
  • Hyerim Ji; 
  • Kyungpyo Hong; 
  • Hee Hwang; 
  • Ho-Young Lee

ABSTRACT

Background:

Although electronic health record (EHR) system adoption rate has reached 96% in US, implementation and usage of health information exchange (HIE) is still lagging behind. Blockchain is in the spotlight as a technology to solve the problem. However, there have been no studies on different perspectives of stakeholders regarding blockchain based patient-centered HIE.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to analyze the awareness among patients, healthcare professionals, and IT developers towards blockchain-based HIE and compare their different perspectives on the platform based upon qualitative research methodology.

Methods:

In this qualitative study, we applied grounded theory and the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in the Health Service (PARiHS) framework. We interviewed patients, physicians, and developers consist of seven participants respectively, for a total of 21 interviewees.

Results:

Regarding the leakage of health information, the patient group did not have concerns unlike physician and developer groups. Physicians were especially concerned about the fact that errors in the data cannot be easily fixed due to the nature of blockchain technology. Patients were not against idea of providing information for clinical trial or research institutions. They wished to be provided with the results of clinical research rather than the compensation for providing the data. The developers emphasized that the blockchain must be technically mature before it can be applied to the healthcare scene, and standards of medical information to be exchanged must be established first. The three groups' perceptions of blockchain were generally positive.

Conclusions:

The result of the study will be the grounds for developing a blockchain platform which can be utilized in the actual healthcare environment.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lee K, Lim K, Jung SY, Ji H, Hong K, Hwang H, Lee HY

Perspectives of Patients, Health Care Professionals, and Developers Toward Blockchain-Based Health Information Exchange: Qualitative Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(11):e18582

DOI: 10.2196/18582

PMID: 33185553

PMCID: 7695529

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.