Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 20, 2020
Date Accepted: Jun 13, 2020
Date Submitted to PubMed: Jun 14, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Technology Evaluation and Assessment Criteria for Health Apps (TEACH-Apps): Pilot Study

Camacho E, Lagan S, Rodriguez-Villa E, Rauseo-Ricupero N, Wisniewski H, Hoffman L, Henson P, Torous J

Technology Evaluation and Assessment Criteria for Health Apps (TEACH-Apps): Pilot Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(8):e18346

DOI: 10.2196/18346

PMID: 32535548

PMCID: 7484774

Technology Evaluation and Assessment Criteria for Health apps (TEACH-apps)

  • Erica Camacho; 
  • Sarah Lagan; 
  • Elena Rodriguez-Villa; 
  • Natali Rauseo-Ricupero; 
  • Hannah Wisniewski; 
  • Liza Hoffman; 
  • Philip Henson; 
  • John Torous

ABSTRACT

Background:

Despite the emergence of app evaluation tools, there remains no well-defined process receptive to diverse local needs, rigorous standards, and current content. The need for such a process to assist in the implementation of app evaluation across all medical fields is evident. Such a process has the potential to increase engagement of stakeholders and catalyze interest and engagement with present-day app evaluation models. To address this need, we developed and pilot tested the Technology Evaluation and Assessment Criteria for Health apps (TEACH-apps).

Objective:

Introduce an implementation process for health app evaluation

Methods:

Tailoring a well-known implementation framework, Replicating Effective Programs, we present a new process to approach the challenges faced in implementing app evaluation tools today. As a culmination of our experience implementing this process and feedback from stakeholders, we present the four-part process to aid the implementation of mobile health technology. This paper outlines the theory, evidence, and initial versions of the process.

Results:

TEACH-apps is designed to be broadly useable and widely applicable across all fields of health. The process is comprised of four parts: 1) Pre-Conditions (e.g. gathering apps and considering local needs), 2) Pre-Implementation (e.g. customizing criteria and offering digital skills training), 3) Implementation (e.g. evaluating apps and creating educational handouts), and 4) Maintenance and Evolution (e.g. repeating the process every 90 days and updating content). TEACH-apps has been tested internally at our hospital and there is growing interest at partnering healthcare facilities to test the system at their sites.

Conclusions:

This implementation framework introduces a process that equips stakeholders, clinicians, and users with the foundational tools to make informed decisions around app use and increase app evaluation engagement. Application of this process may lead to the selection of more culturally appropriate and clinically relevant tools in healthcare.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Camacho E, Lagan S, Rodriguez-Villa E, Rauseo-Ricupero N, Wisniewski H, Hoffman L, Henson P, Torous J

Technology Evaluation and Assessment Criteria for Health Apps (TEACH-Apps): Pilot Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(8):e18346

DOI: 10.2196/18346

PMID: 32535548

PMCID: 7484774

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.