Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics
Date Submitted: Feb 16, 2020
Date Accepted: Jan 31, 2021
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Comparative Analysis of Paper-based and Web-based Versions NFBSI-16 (National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Symptom Index) Questionnaire in Breast Cancer Patients: Randomised, crossover study.
ABSTRACT
Background:
Breast cancer remains the most common neoplasm diagnosed amongst women in China and globally. Health-related questionnaire assessments in research and clinical oncology settings have gained prominence. National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Symptom Index (NFBSI-16) is a rapid and powerful tool to help evaluate the disease or treatment-related symptoms, both physical and emotional, in patients with breast cancer for clinical and research need. Prevalence of individual smartphones and social apps provide a potential electronic approach to administrating questionnaire; however, the reliability of NFBSI-16 in electronic format has not been assessed.
Objective:
This study aimed to assess the reliability of web-based measurement of NFBSI-16 in the Chinese language in breast cancer patients undergoing systematic treatment.
Methods:
We recruited patients with breast cancer under systematic treatment to complete both paper- and web-based questionnaires. Patients were randomly assigned to group A (paper- based first and web-based second) or group B (web- based first and paper-based second). A total of 354 patients included in the analysis successfully completed both versions of the NFBSI-16 questionnaire in Chinese language. Descriptive sociodemographic characteristics, reliability and agreement rates for single items, subscale, and total score were analyzed using Wilcoxon test. Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), Spearman and Kendall tau rank correlation were used to assess test-retest reliability.
Results:
Test-retest reliability was excellent with CCCs 0.94 for the total NFBSI-16 score. Highly significant correlations were documented for all 4 subscales, 16 individual items, and total NFBSI-16 score. Mean differences of the test and re-test were all close to zero (≤0.06). A majority of the participants in this study preferred the web-based (72%, n=255) over the paper-based version.
Conclusions:
The web-based version of the NFBSI-16 questionnaire is reliable for patients with breast cancer and demonstrated highly significant correlations with the paper-based version in all items, subscales and the total score. The web-based version of the NFBSI-16 questionnaire is an excellent tool for monitoring individual breast cancer patients under treatment, also as a majority of participants preferred it over paper-based version.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.