Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Feb 9, 2020
Date Accepted: May 9, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Process Evaluation of an eHealth Intervention (Food4toddlers) to Improve Toddlers' Diet: Randomized Controlled Trial

Røed M, Vik FN, Hillesund ER, Van Lippewelde W, Medin AC, Øverby NC

Process Evaluation of an eHealth Intervention (Food4toddlers) to Improve Toddlers' Diet: Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Hum Factors 2020;7(3):e18171

DOI: 10.2196/18171

PMID: 32628612

PMCID: 7381021

Process evaluation of an eHealth intervention to improve toddler’s diet: The Food4toddlers study.

  • Margrethe Røed; 
  • Frøydis Nordgård Vik; 
  • Elisabet Rudjord Hillesund; 
  • Wendy Van Lippewelde; 
  • Anine Christine Medin; 
  • Nina Cecilie Øverby

ABSTRACT

Background:

Parents seek trustworthy information online to promote healthy eating for their toddlers. Such information must be perceived as relevant and easy to implement to be used.

Objective:

The aim of this paper is to conduct a process evaluation of the eHealth intervention Food4toddlers targeting parental feeding practices and toddlers’ diet and to examine possible differences in such according to education and family composition.

Methods:

A two-armed randomized controlled trial, including 298 parent-toddler dyads from Norway, was conducted in 2017. In total, 148 parents in the intervention group got access to an intervention website for 6 months. Data on website usage was retrieved from the learning management platform used (NEO). Participants’ satisfaction with the intervention was asked for in a post-intervention questionnaire. Chi-square and t-tests were used to examine differences in usage and satisfaction between education and family composition groups.

Results:

Most participants were mothers (98%), lived in two adult households (100%), and were born in Norway (89%). Mean parental age was 31.5 years (SD = 4.2). More than 85% had a university education degree and 56% had > 4 years of university education. Most (85%) intervention participants entered the website at least once (mean days of access: 7.4 (SD: 7.1)). Most parents reported the website as appropriate to the child's age and self-explanatory (86-93 %) and appreciated the interface and layout (56-63%). In total, 61% stated that they learned something new from the intervention. Those with > 4 years university education and one-child households used the intervention website more than parents with ≤ 4 years university education (8.4 vs. 5.9 days, P=.04) and households with more than one child (8.3 vs 5.8 days, P=.04), respectively.

Conclusions:

The Food4toddlers intervention website was found relevant by most of the participants intervention group, although usage of the website differed according to educational level and family composition. For eHealth interventions to be effective, intervention material such as websites must be used by the target group. Our results highlight the need of including users from different groups when developing interventions. Clinical Trial: ISRCTN92980420


 Citation

Please cite as:

Røed M, Vik FN, Hillesund ER, Van Lippewelde W, Medin AC, Øverby NC

Process Evaluation of an eHealth Intervention (Food4toddlers) to Improve Toddlers' Diet: Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Hum Factors 2020;7(3):e18171

DOI: 10.2196/18171

PMID: 32628612

PMCID: 7381021

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.