Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Feb 7, 2020
Date Accepted: Jul 26, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Patients and Medical Staff Attitudes Toward the Future Inclusion of eHealth in Tuberculosis Management: Perspectives From Six Countries Evaluated using a Qualitative Framework

Margineanu I, Louka C, Vincenti-Gonzalez M, Saktiawati AMI, Schierle J, Abass KM, Akkerman O, Alffenaar JW, Ranchor AV, Stienstra Y

Patients and Medical Staff Attitudes Toward the Future Inclusion of eHealth in Tuberculosis Management: Perspectives From Six Countries Evaluated using a Qualitative Framework

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(11):e18156

DOI: 10.2196/18156

PMID: 33136052

PMCID: 7669445

Patients and Medical Staff Attitudes Towards the Future Inclusion of eHealth in Tuberculosis Management: Perspectives from Six Countries Evaluated using a Qualitative Framework

  • Ioana Margineanu; 
  • Christina Louka; 
  • Maria Vincenti-Gonzalez; 
  • Antonia Morita Iswari Saktiawati; 
  • Johannes Schierle; 
  • Kabiru M Abass; 
  • Onno Akkerman; 
  • Jan-Willem Alffenaar; 
  • Adelita V Ranchor; 
  • Ymkje Stienstra

ABSTRACT

Background:

Digitally delivering healthcare services (eHealth) is very attractive for tuberculosis (TB) management, as this disease has a complex diagnosis, lengthy management, and involving multiple medical and non-medical specialists. Especially in low and middle income countries, eHealth could potentially offer cost-effective solutions to bridge financial, social, time and distance challenges.

Objective:

To understand what would make eHealth globally applicable and to gain insight into different TB situations, opportunities, and challenges.

Methods:

We performed focus group interviews (FGI) with TB experts and patients from six different countries on four different continents. The FGIs followed the theory of planned behaviour framework in order to offer structured recommendations for a versatile eHealth solution. The FGIs were preceded by a general demographic and technology usage questionnaire. Questionnaire results were analysed using basic statistics in Microsoft Excel. FGI data was analysed using ATLAS.ti V.8 by assigning codes to quotations and grouping codes into the five domains within the framework.

Results:

A total of 29 patients and 32 medical staff members were included in our study. All medical staff had used the internet whereas 31% of patients had never been online. The codes with the most quotations were information in relation to eHealth (144 quotations) and communication (67 quotations). The consensus amongst all participants, from all countries is that there are important communication and information gaps which could be bridged by an eHealth application. Participants from different countries also highlighted different challenges, such as a majority of asylum seeker patients or lack of infrastructure which could be addressed by building an eHealth app.

Conclusions:

Within the six countries interviewed there is high enthusiasm towards eHealth in TB. A potential app could first target information and communication gaps in tuberculosis, with additional modules aimed at setting-specific challenges.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Margineanu I, Louka C, Vincenti-Gonzalez M, Saktiawati AMI, Schierle J, Abass KM, Akkerman O, Alffenaar JW, Ranchor AV, Stienstra Y

Patients and Medical Staff Attitudes Toward the Future Inclusion of eHealth in Tuberculosis Management: Perspectives From Six Countries Evaluated using a Qualitative Framework

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(11):e18156

DOI: 10.2196/18156

PMID: 33136052

PMCID: 7669445

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.