Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Feb 4, 2020
Date Accepted: Jun 15, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Clinician Perspectives and Design Implications in Using Patient-Generated Health Data to Improve Mental Health Practices: Mixed Methods Study

Wu DT, Xin C, Bindhu S, Xu C, Sachdeva J, Brown J, Jung H

Clinician Perspectives and Design Implications in Using Patient-Generated Health Data to Improve Mental Health Practices: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Form Res 2020;4(8):e18123

DOI: 10.2196/18123

PMID: 32763884

PMCID: 7442947

Clinician Perspectives and Design Implications in Using Patient Generated Health Data to Improve Mental Health Practices

  • Danny T.Y. Wu; 
  • Chen Xin; 
  • Shwetha Bindhu; 
  • Catherine Xu; 
  • Jyoti Sachdeva; 
  • Jennifer Brown; 
  • Heekyoung Jung

ABSTRACT

Background:

Patient-generated health data (PGHD) has been largely collected through mobile-based health applications (mHealth apps) and wearable devices. PGHD can be especially helpful in mental health, since patients’ illness history and symptom narratives are vital to developing diagnoses and treatment plans. However, the extent of clinicians’ use of mental health-related PGHD is unknown.

Objective:

A mixed-method study was conducted to understand clinicians’ perspectives on PGHD and current mental health apps. This approach built on information gathered from semi-structured interviews, workflow analysis, and user-written mental health app reviews to answer the following research questions: 1) What is the current workflow of mental health practice and how is PGHD integrated in this workflow? 2) What are physician perspectives on PGHD and how do they choose mobile apps for their patients? 3) What are the features of current mobile apps in terms of interpreting and sharing PGHD?

Methods:

The study consisted of semi-structured interviews with 12 psychiatrists and clinical psychologists from a large academic hospital. These interviews were then thematically and qualitatively analyzed for common themes and workflow elements. App-user reviews were then analyzed to understand app features and their usability in comparison to the information gathered from interviews.

Results:

The results showed that PGHD has been part of the workflow, but its integration and use are not optimized. Mental health clinicians supported the use of PGHD but also identified challenges in selecting suitable apps for their patients. From the app review, it was shown that mHealth apps had limited features to support personalization and collaborative care and had data interpretation and sharing issues. Based on the findings, design implications were discussed with the goal of improving PGHD use within and mHealth app design for mental health practice.

Conclusions:

The study showed that PGHD has not been used optimally in mental health practices. Clinicians expressed concerns regarding how PGHD may be used to improve workflow and how it may be integrated with current EHR systems. Moreover, mental health clinicians also faced challenges in helping their patients choosing appropriate apps. Finally, several design implications were identified from the results of the app review that will be used to drive future research regarding PGHD use in mental health. Clinical Trial: None


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wu DT, Xin C, Bindhu S, Xu C, Sachdeva J, Brown J, Jung H

Clinician Perspectives and Design Implications in Using Patient-Generated Health Data to Improve Mental Health Practices: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Form Res 2020;4(8):e18123

DOI: 10.2196/18123

PMID: 32763884

PMCID: 7442947

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.