Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Jan 18, 2020
Date Accepted: Mar 23, 2020
Older People in Digital Health Research: What Predicts (Non-)Participation in an Exergame Intervention Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
The use of digital technologies is increasing in healthcare. However, studies evaluating digital health technologies can be characterized by selective non-participation of older people, although older people represent one of the main user groups in healthcare.
Objective:
We examined whether and how participation in an exergame intervention study was associated with age, gender and heart failure (HF) symptom severity.
Methods:
A subset of data from the HF-Wii study was used. The data come from patients with HF in institutional settings in Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Sweden. Selective non-participation was examined as resulting from two processes: (non-)recruitment and self-selection. Baseline information on age, gender, New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification of 1632 patients with HF were the predictor variables. These patients were screened for HF-Wii study participation. Reasons for non-participation were evaluated.
Results:
Of the screened 1632 patients, 71% did not participate. The non-recruitment rate was 21% and based on this eligible sample, the refusal rate was 61%. Higher age was associated with lower probability of participation; it increased both the probabilities of not being recruited and declining to participate. More severe symptoms increased the likelihood of non-recruitment. Gender had no effect. The most common reasons for non-recruitment and self-selection were related to physical limitations and lack of time respectively.
Conclusions:
Results indicate that selective non-participation takes place in digital health research and that it is associated with age and symptom severity. Gender effects cannot be proven. Such a systematic selection can lead to biased research results which inappropriately inform research, policy, and practice.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.