Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Jan 15, 2020
Date Accepted: Apr 20, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Del Nido Cardioplegia Versus Cold Blood Cardioplegia in Adult Cardiac Surgery: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

García Suárez J, García Fernández J, Sanz Serrano S, Martínez López D, Requés González L, Forteza Gil A

Del Nido Cardioplegia Versus Cold Blood Cardioplegia in Adult Cardiac Surgery: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Res Protoc 2020;9(7):e17826

DOI: 10.2196/17826

PMID: 32673265

PMCID: 7388037

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Del Nido cardioplegia versus cold blood cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

  • Jessica García Suárez; 
  • Javier García Fernández; 
  • Sergio Sanz Serrano; 
  • Daniel Martínez López; 
  • Leticia Requés González; 
  • Alberto Forteza Gil

ABSTRACT

Background:

The use of cardioplegia solutions as a myocardial protection technique is essential during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Del Nido cardioplegia solution (DNS) has been widely used as a myocardial preservation technique for pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Its unique pharmacological features have created growing interest for adult cardiac surgery, especially for elderly patients or those with ventricular dysfunction, more prone to ischemia-reperfusion injury. Ever since its implementation, several retrospective studies have been published to validate the efficacy, safety and efficiency of DNS in adult patients undergoing coronary revascularization, valve replacement or combined procedures. Recently, a meta-analysis based on 9 retrospective studies has been published claiming the non-inferiority of Del Nido solution compared to other conventional cardioplegia solutions. Currently there are no prospective randomized studies whose primary outcome is the assessment of Del Nido solution clinical efficacy compared to other solutions commonly used in adult patients.

Objective:

The aim of this randomized clinical trial is to assess the benefits of Del Nido solution compared to Cardibraun blood cardioplegia solution in clinical terms of myocardial protection.

Methods:

This is the protocol of a controlled, randomized, single-center clinical trial carried out in the University Hospital Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, in Spain. 474 participants over the age of 18 undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass will be simple randomized to receive Del Nido cardioplegia solution or Cardibraun blood cardioplegia solution.

Results:

The primary outcome will analyze the differences regarding myocardial protection in biochemical terms (perioperative troponin levels) and clinical terms (presence of the composite variable “acute cardiovascular event”).

Conclusions:

This protocol intends to resolve potential benefits of Del Nido cardioplegia solution in clinical terms regarding myocardial protection. Clinical Trial: This trial is registered in EU Clinical Trials Register under the number EUDRA-CT 2017-005144-14 in April 2018. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04094168. (Retrospectively registered).


 Citation

Please cite as:

García Suárez J, García Fernández J, Sanz Serrano S, Martínez López D, Requés González L, Forteza Gil A

Del Nido Cardioplegia Versus Cold Blood Cardioplegia in Adult Cardiac Surgery: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

JMIR Res Protoc 2020;9(7):e17826

DOI: 10.2196/17826

PMID: 32673265

PMCID: 7388037

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.