Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jan 13, 2020
Date Accepted: Jun 14, 2020
Date Submitted to PubMed: Jul 14, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

A Federated Online Search Tool for Biospecimens (Sample Locator): Usability Study

Schüttler C, Huth V, von Jagwitz-Biegnitz M, Lablans M, Prokosch HU, Griebel L

A Federated Online Search Tool for Biospecimens (Sample Locator): Usability Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(8):e17739

DOI: 10.2196/17739

PMID: 32663150

PMCID: 7463387

Usability Analysis of the “Sample Locator”: a Federated Online Search Tool for Biospecimens

  • Christina Schüttler; 
  • Verena Huth; 
  • Magdaléna von Jagwitz-Biegnitz; 
  • Martin Lablans; 
  • Hans-Ulrich Prokosch; 
  • Lena Griebel

ABSTRACT

Background:

The German Biobank Alliance (GBA) aims to establish a cross-site biobank network. For this endeavor, the so-called Sample Locator has been developed ‒ a federated search-tool for biospecimens and related data ‒ forming the heart of its IT infrastructure.

Objective:

To ensure the sustainable use of such a tool, we included researchers as participants in an end user based usability evaluation.

Methods:

To develop a prototype ready for evaluation, we needed input from GBA IT experts. Thus, we conducted a two-day workshop with eight GBA IT team members. Focus was on the respective steps of a user-centered design process. With the acquired knowledge, the participants designed low fidelity mockups. The main ideas of these mockups were discussed, extracted and summarized into a comprehensive prototype using MS PowerPoint. Furthermore, we created a questionnaire concerning the usability of the prototype including the System Usability Score (SUS), questions on negative/ positive aspects, and typical tasks to be fulfilled with the tool. Subsequently, the prototype was pre-tested on basis of this questionnaire with researchers having biobank background. Based on this preliminary work, the usability analysis was ultimately carried out with researchers and the results were evaluated.

Results:

Altogether 27 researchers familiar with sample requests evaluated the prototype. The analysis of the feedback certifies a good usability given the Sample Locator prototype was seen as intuitive and user-friendly, by 74% of the participants. The total SUS score of 25 persons that completed the questionnaire is 80.4, indicating good system usability. Still, the evaluation provided useful advice on optimization potential, e.g. by offering a help function.

Conclusions:

The findings of this usability analysis indicate that the considerations regarding a user-friendly application, which have been made in the development process so far, strongly coincide with the perception of the study participants. Nevertheless, it was important to engage prospective end users to ensure that the previous development is going in the desired direction and that the Sample Locator will be used in the future. The user comments and suggestions for improvement will be considered in upcoming iterations for refinement.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Schüttler C, Huth V, von Jagwitz-Biegnitz M, Lablans M, Prokosch HU, Griebel L

A Federated Online Search Tool for Biospecimens (Sample Locator): Usability Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(8):e17739

DOI: 10.2196/17739

PMID: 32663150

PMCID: 7463387

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.