Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Dec 11, 2019
Date Accepted: Mar 22, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Health Care Professionals’ Views on Using Remote Measurement Technology in Managing Central Nervous System Disorders: Qualitative Interview Study

Andrews JA, Craven MP, Jamnadas-Khoda J, Lang AR, Morriss R, Hollis C, The RADAR-CNS Consortium

Health Care Professionals’ Views on Using Remote Measurement Technology in Managing Central Nervous System Disorders: Qualitative Interview Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(7):e17414

DOI: 10.2196/17414

PMID: 32706664

PMCID: 7414408

Healthcare professional views of implementing remote measurement technology in central nervous system disorders: A qualitative interview study

  • Jacob Alexander Andrews; 
  • Michael P Craven; 
  • Jenny Jamnadas-Khoda; 
  • Alexandra R Lang; 
  • Richard Morriss; 
  • Chris Hollis; 
  • The RADAR-CNS Consortium

ABSTRACT

Background:

Remote measurement technologies (RMTs) can be used to collect data on a variety of bio-behavioural variables, which may benefit the care of people with central nervous system disorders. While various studies have explored their potential, prior work has highlighted a knowledge gap concerning healthcare professional’s perception of the value of RMTs in clinical practice.

Objective:

To understand the perspectives of healthcare professionals on the implementation of RMT in healthcare practice for the care of people with depression, epilepsy or multiple sclerosis.

Methods:

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 multidisciplinary primary and secondary care healthcare professionals managing people with epilepsy, depression or multiple sclerosis. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis.

Results:

Eight main themes emerged from the analysis. Healthcare professionals considered RMT data to be informative for the care of patients and empowering to patients in all three conditions. However, professionals indicated decisions about care should not be made exclusively on the basis of RMT data. Implementing RMTs may require new staff roles to manage incoming data if RMTs are used to alert services to signs of relapse. Results also indicate points in care pathways at which healthcare staff would most benefit from RMT data, and demonstrate that healthcare professionals are pragmatic about data security risks arising from using patients’ RMT data.

Conclusions:

RMTs could add value to the system of care for individual patients with central nervous system disorders through providing clinicians with graphic summaries of data in the patient record. Barriers of both technical and human nature should be considered when implementing these technologies, as should the limits to the benefits they can offer.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Andrews JA, Craven MP, Jamnadas-Khoda J, Lang AR, Morriss R, Hollis C, The RADAR-CNS Consortium

Health Care Professionals’ Views on Using Remote Measurement Technology in Managing Central Nervous System Disorders: Qualitative Interview Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(7):e17414

DOI: 10.2196/17414

PMID: 32706664

PMCID: 7414408

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.