Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Dec 6, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Dec 6, 2019 - Jan 6, 2020
Date Accepted: Mar 2, 2020
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
The patients’ perspective on mental health specialist video consultations in primary care: A qualitative pre-implementation study of anticipated benefits, barriers, and therapeutic relationship
ABSTRACT
Background:
Due to limited access to specialist services, most patients with mental health conditions usually receive treatment in primary care. More recently, innovative technology-based care models (e.g., video consultations) have been proposed to facilitate access to specialist services.
Objective:
From the patients’ perspective, this qualitative pre-implementation study explores (a) anticipated benefits from and (b) barriers to implementing mental health specialist video consultations embedded in primary care services and (c) prerequisites for interacting with therapists via video consultations.
Methods:
Using a convenience sampling strategy, we recruited 13 patients from primary care services and a tertiary care hospital for one-off semi-structured interviews. In a computer-assisted thematic analysis, we inductively (bottom-up) derived key themes concerning the practicability of mental health specialist video consultations. To validate our results, we discussed our findings with the interviewees as part of a systematic member checking.
Results:
Overall, we derived three key themes and ten subthemes. Participants identified specific benefits in two areas, namely the accessibility to mental health specialist care (shorter waiting times (11/13, 85%), overcoming stigma for seeking specialist mental health care (6/13, 46%), shorter travel distances (3/13, 23%)) and the environment in primary care (familiar travel modalities, premises, and employees (5/13, 38%)). The main barriers to the implementation of mental health video consultations from the patients’ perspective were the lack of face-to-face contact (13/13, 100%) and technical challenges (12/13, 92%). Notably, participants’ prerequisites for interacting with therapists (12/13, 92%) did not seem to differ much from those concerning face-to-face contacts.
Conclusions:
Mental health service users mostly welcome mental health specialist video consultations in primary care. Taking a pragmatic stance, service users, who are often frustrated about uncoordinated care, particularly value the embedment of the consultations in the familiar environment of the primary care practice. With respect to interventional studies and implementation, our findings underscore the need to minimize technical disruptions during video consultations as well as ensure optimal resemblance to face-to-face settings (e.g., by training therapists in consistently reacting to verbal cues). Clinical Trial: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00012487; https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00012487
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.