Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Nov 25, 2019
Date Accepted: Mar 2, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Therapeutic Alliance in Technology-Based Interventions for the Treatment of Depression: Systematic Review

Wehmann E, Köhnen M, Härter M, Liebherz S

Therapeutic Alliance in Technology-Based Interventions for the Treatment of Depression: Systematic Review

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(6):e17195

DOI: 10.2196/17195

PMID: 32525484

PMCID: 7317632

The Therapeutic Alliance in technology-based interventions for the treatment of depression: a systematic review

  • Eileen Wehmann; 
  • Moritz Köhnen; 
  • Martin Härter; 
  • Sarah Liebherz

ABSTRACT

Background:

There is growing evidence, that technology-based psychological interventions (TBIs) are effective for the treatment of depression. As TBIs are gaining acceptance, the question arises, if good therapeutic alliance, considered a key aspect of psychotherapy, can be established without / with minimal face-to-face contact or rather changes if blended concepts are applied. While therapeutic alliance has been studied extensively in the context of face-to-face therapy, only a few studies have reviewed the evidence on alliance ratings in TBIs.

Objective:

The purpose of this paper is to examine the therapeutic alliance in technology-based psychological interventions for the treatment of depression.

Methods:

We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX, CINAHL, clinical trial registers, and sources of grey literature for RCTs on TBIs in the treatment of adults with unipolar depression. All publications were selected according to pre-specified criteria. Data were extracted by two independent review authors.

Results:

A total of eight out of 98 studies included in the review on TBIs for depression considered the therapeutic alliance as part of their evaluation (9.5%). The available data covered eight different treatment conditions, four stand-alone treatments (face-to-face psychotherapy, email, telephone, internet program), and four combined treatments (face-to-face psychotherapy plus a smartphone application, an internet program combined with either face-to-face psychotherapy, care-as-usual, or email/ telephone). On average, patients rated the alliance positively across all groups. Importantly, no statistically significant group differences regarding the therapeutic alliance sum scores were found in any of the studies. Five studies investigated the relationship between patients’ alliance ratings and treatment outcome, revealing mixed results.

Conclusions:

Our results suggest that it is possible to establish a positive therapeutic alliance across a variety of different technology-based interventions for depression, but are based on a small number of studies. Future research needs to address on what basis therapeutic alliance is formed in settings that do not allow for additional non-verbal cues, perhaps with adapted instruments to measure the therapeutic alliance. Clinical Trial: CRD42016050413


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wehmann E, Köhnen M, Härter M, Liebherz S

Therapeutic Alliance in Technology-Based Interventions for the Treatment of Depression: Systematic Review

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(6):e17195

DOI: 10.2196/17195

PMID: 32525484

PMCID: 7317632

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.