Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Nov 18, 2019
Date Accepted: Feb 6, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Cost-Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Psychosis: Health-Economic Evaluation Within a Randomized Controlled Trial

Pot-Kolder R, Veling W, Geraets C, Lokkerbol J, Smit F, Jongeneel A, Ising H, van der Gaag M

Cost-Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Psychosis: Health-Economic Evaluation Within a Randomized Controlled Trial

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(5):e17098

DOI: 10.2196/17098

PMID: 32369036

PMCID: 7238085

Cost-effectiveness of virtual reality cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis

  • Roos Pot-Kolder; 
  • Wim Veling; 
  • Chris Geraets; 
  • Joran Lokkerbol; 
  • Filip Smit; 
  • Alyssa Jongeneel; 
  • Helga Ising; 
  • Mark van der Gaag

ABSTRACT

Background:

There is evidence for the effectiveness of virtual reality based cognitive behavioural therapy (VR-CBT) for treating paranoia in psychosis, but health-economic evaluations are lacking.

Objective:

This study aimed to determine a short-term cost-effectiveness of VR-CBT from a societal perspective.

Methods:

The health-economic evaluation was embedded in a randomized controlled trial on VR-CBT in 116 patients with a psychotic disorder suffering from paranoid ideation. The control group (n = 58) received treatment as usual (TAU) for psychotic disorders in accordance with the clinical guidelines. The experimental group (n = 58) received TAU complemented with add-on VR-CBT to reduce paranoid ideation and social avoidance. Nine months of data were collected at baseline, three and six months post baseline. Treatment response was defined as a pre-post symptoms improvement of at least 20% in social participation measures. Change in quality adjusted life years (QALY) was estimated by using Sanderson’s conversion factor to map a change in Green’s Paranoid Thoughts Scale (GPTS) standardized mean difference on a corresponding change in utility. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated using 5,000 bootstraps of seemingly unrelated regression equations of costs and effects. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were graphed for the costs per treatment responder and per QALY gained.

Results:

The average mean incremental costs for a treatment responder on social participation ranged between €8,079-€19,525, with 90.74 to 99.74% showing improvement. The average incremental cost per QALY was €48,868 over the six months of follow-up with 99.98% showing improved QALYs. Sensitivity analyses show costs to be lower when relevant baseline differences were included in the analysis. Average costs per treatment responder now ranged between €6,800 and €16,597, average cost per QALY gained was €42,030.

Conclusions:

The study demonstrates that offering VR-CBT to patients with paranoid delusions is an economically viable approach towards improving the patients’ health in a cost-effective manner. Long-term effects need further research. Clinical Trial: ISRCTN number 12929657


 Citation

Please cite as:

Pot-Kolder R, Veling W, Geraets C, Lokkerbol J, Smit F, Jongeneel A, Ising H, van der Gaag M

Cost-Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Psychosis: Health-Economic Evaluation Within a Randomized Controlled Trial

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(5):e17098

DOI: 10.2196/17098

PMID: 32369036

PMCID: 7238085

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.