Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting

Date Submitted: Nov 13, 2019
Date Accepted: Apr 27, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

High School Students’ Preferences and Design Recommendations for a Mobile Phone–Based Intervention to Improve Psychological Well-Being: Mixed Methods Study

Müssener U, Thomas K, Bendtsen P, Bendtsen M

High School Students’ Preferences and Design Recommendations for a Mobile Phone–Based Intervention to Improve Psychological Well-Being: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Pediatr Parent 2020;3(2):e17044

DOI: 10.2196/17044

PMID: 32673268

PMCID: 7381011

High school students’ preferences and design recommendations for a mobile phone-based intervention to improve psychological wellbeing: a mixed-methods study

  • Ulrika Müssener; 
  • Kristin Thomas; 
  • Preben Bendtsen; 
  • Marcus Bendtsen

ABSTRACT

Background:

Young adults’ mental health is characterised by relatively high rates of stress and anxiety and low levels of help-seeking behaviour. mHealth interventions could offer a cost-effective, and readily available, avenue to provide personalized support to young adults. More research needs to be directed at the development of mHealth intervention targeting youths specifically, as well as on how to reach young people and to effectively intervene to improve psychological wellbeing.

Objective:

The objective was to acquire perceptions from high school students to inform the development of a prototype mHealth intervention aiming to promote psychological wellbeing.

Methods:

A mixed methods design was used to 1) investigate high school students’ perceptions about stress and its consequences in daily life, as well as their ability to cope with stress and, 2) explore their preferences and design recommendations for an mHealth intervention to improve psychological wellbeing. Students from two high schools in the south east of Sweden were invited to take part in the study. Recruitment of high school students was completed over a six-week period (between the 25th October and 7th December 2018). Recruitment entailed inviting students to complete a stress test (screening and feedback) on their mobile phones. After completing the stress test, all participants were invited to complete a follow-up questionnaire and take part in telephone interviews.

Results:

A total of 149 high school students completed the stress test of which 68 completed the questionnaire. There were 67 free-text comments distributed across the items. The majority of participants, 55 (81%), stated that they coped with stress better or in the same way after engaging in the stress test, due to time management, dialogue with others and self-refection. Four participants, 3 women and one man, took part in telephone interviews. Three main themes were found in the interview data: perceptions about stress, design features and intervention features.

Conclusions:

Stress was described as a condition caused by high demands set by oneself and the social environment that impacted their physical health, personal relationships, school performance, and emotional wellbeing. Participants claimed that mHealth intervention need to be clearly tailored to a young age group, be evidence-based and offer varied type of support such as information about stress, exercises to help organize tasks, self-assessment, coping tools, recommendations to other useful websites, literature, blogs, self-help books or role models. Using mobile phones seemed to be a feasible and acceptable platform for the delivery of an intervention.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Müssener U, Thomas K, Bendtsen P, Bendtsen M

High School Students’ Preferences and Design Recommendations for a Mobile Phone–Based Intervention to Improve Psychological Well-Being: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Pediatr Parent 2020;3(2):e17044

DOI: 10.2196/17044

PMID: 32673268

PMCID: 7381011

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.