Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Nov 12, 2019
Date Accepted: Apr 10, 2020
Date Submitted to PubMed: Jul 14, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Improving Patients’ Medication Adherence and Outcomes in Nonhospital Settings Through eHealth: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Wong ZS, Siy B, Lopes KDS, Georgiou A

Improving Patients’ Medication Adherence and Outcomes in Nonhospital Settings Through eHealth: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(8):e17015

DOI: 10.2196/17015

PMID: 32663145

PMCID: 7471892

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Does ehealth improve patient’s medication adherence and outcomes in non-hospital settings? A systematic review

  • Zoie SY Wong; 
  • Braylien Siy; 
  • Katharina Da Silva Lopes; 
  • Andrew Georgiou

ABSTRACT

Background:

Integrating ehealth into medication prescription, dispensing and administration processes is a promising direction towards achieving better medication safety, treatment and health outcomes.

Objective:

To assess evidence on whether ehealth can improve drug compliance and health outcomes through self-administration of medication in non-hospital settings.

Methods:

We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Emcare, ProQuest, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and IEEE Xplore, in addition to other published sources between 2000 to 2018. We evaluated the studies against primary outcome measures of medication adherence and multiple secondary healthcare outcome measures relating to adverse events, quality of life, patient satisfaction and health expenditure. Subgroup comparison was performed and the quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias tool.

Results:

Twenty-four studies met the selection criteria and they were all designed for patient home-based care application. Fifteen studies reported an outcome measure of medication adherence and of these 13 indicated improvement of medication adherence at a significant level p < 0.1. The top three associated functions including: mechanisms to communicate with care givers, monitoring health features, and reminders and alerts. Multi-functional intervention was a more commonly adopted model for designing ehealth for self-medication management. The overall quality of the included studies were rated as moderate.

Conclusions:

A mechanism to communicate with care givers was the common function offered by all the ehealth interventions. Integrating multiple functions into the ehealth design tended to be more effective in achieving an enhanced medication adherence level. A targeted study population, such as older patients, should be considered to maximize the public health impact on the self-management of diseases. Clinical Trial: PROSPERO registry number: CRD42018096627.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wong ZS, Siy B, Lopes KDS, Georgiou A

Improving Patients’ Medication Adherence and Outcomes in Nonhospital Settings Through eHealth: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(8):e17015

DOI: 10.2196/17015

PMID: 32663145

PMCID: 7471892

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.