Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Nov 6, 2019
Date Accepted: Dec 3, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Teaching Real-World Evidence: Protocol for a Systematic Review

Lam C, Chaudhury H, Meinert E

Teaching Real-World Evidence: Protocol for a Systematic Review

JMIR Res Protoc 2020;9(1):e16941

DOI: 10.2196/16941

PMID: 32012110

PMCID: 7055761

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Teaching Real World Evidence: A Systematic Review Protocol

  • Ching Lam; 
  • Hassan Chaudhury; 
  • Edward Meinert

ABSTRACT

Background:

Real world evidence (RWE) refers to observational healthcare data beyond clinical trial data. It holds promise of transforming healthcare as a new form of evidence to support decision-makers in making decisions in developing and regulating medicines. As the importance of RWE is recognised by industry and regulatory bodies, teaching RWE becomes an important matter to evaluate and refine in order to develop future researchers and stakeholders who can better integrate RWE into the routine development of medicine.

Objective:

The aim of this review is to understand how real world evidence is currently being taught. From this landscape study, the insufficiencies of current education of RWE can be identified and subsequently inform future education policies around RWE and its sub-facets.

Methods:

We will search Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, HMIC, Cochrane and Web of Science for published studies using a combination of keywords and subject headings related to RWE and education. In addition, a Google search to identify grey literature will be conducted. Two authors will independently screen the titles and abstracts identified from the search and accept or reject the studies according to the study inclusion criteria, and any discrepancies will then be discussed and resolved. The quality of the selected literature will be assessed using the CASP Systematic Review checklist.

Results:

Data from eligible publications will be abstracted into a predesigned form in order to better understand the current state of education of RWE and inform future RWE education directions and policies.

Conclusions:

The subsequent systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Lam C, Chaudhury H, Meinert E

Teaching Real-World Evidence: Protocol for a Systematic Review

JMIR Res Protoc 2020;9(1):e16941

DOI: 10.2196/16941

PMID: 32012110

PMCID: 7055761

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.