Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Oct 30, 2019
Date Accepted: Jun 3, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Mobile Health App Trustworthiness Checklist: Usability Assessment

van Haasteren A, Vayena E, Powell J

The Mobile Health App Trustworthiness Checklist: Usability Assessment

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(7):e16844

DOI: 10.2196/16844

PMID: 32706733

PMCID: 7404005

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

The mHealth app trustworthiness checklist: a validation study

  • Afua van Haasteren; 
  • Effy Vayena; 
  • John Powell

ABSTRACT

Background:

The mHealth app trustworthiness (mHAT) checklist was created to identify end-users’ opinions on the characteristics of trustworthy mHealth apps and to communicate this information to app developers. To ensure that the checklist is suited for all relevant stakeholders, it is necessary to validate its contents.

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to validate the mHAT checklist by modifying its contents according to ratings and suggestions from stakeholders familiar with the process of developing, managing, or curating mHealth apps.

Methods:

A 44-item online survey was administered to relevant stakeholders. The survey was largely comprised of the mHAT checklist items which respondents rated on a five-point Likert-type scale from completely disagree to completely agree.

Results:

In total, 7 professional backgrounds were represented in the survey: administrators (n = 6), health professionals (n = 7), IT personnel (n = 6), managers (n = 2), marketing personnel (n = 3), researchers (n = 5), and user experience researchers (n = 8). None of the checklist items were terminated since the combined positive ratings (agree and completely agree) exceeded that of the combined negative ratings (disagree and completely disagree). Rather, two new suggestions were added: 1) business or funding model of the app and 2) details on app uninstallation statistics.

Conclusions:

Our results indicate that the mHAT checklist is a valuable resource for a broad range of stakeholders to develop trustworthy mHealth apps. Future studies should examine if the checklist works best for certain mHealth apps or in specific settings.


 Citation

Please cite as:

van Haasteren A, Vayena E, Powell J

The Mobile Health App Trustworthiness Checklist: Usability Assessment

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(7):e16844

DOI: 10.2196/16844

PMID: 32706733

PMCID: 7404005

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.