Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Oct 6, 2019
Date Accepted: Sep 4, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Patient Perception of Mobile Phone Apps for the Care and Prevention of Sexually Transmitted Diseases: Cross-Sectional Study

Patient Perception of Mobile Phone Apps for the Care and Prevention of Sexually Transmitted Diseases: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(11):e16517

DOI: 10.2196/16517

PMID: 33170133

PMCID: 7685917

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Patient perception of mobile phone applications for the care and prevention of sexually transmitted diseases (STD’s): A cross-sectional study in an STD clinic setting

ABSTRACT

Background:

In the emerging era of digitalization and electronic health, various health-related apps have been launched, including apps for sexually transmitted diseases (STD’s). Until now, little is known about how patients perceive the value of such apps.

Objective:

To investigate patient attitudes and their awareness towards STD-related apps in an outpatient STD clinic setting.

Methods:

A cross-sectional study was conducted at the venereological outpatient unit of the University Hospital (LMU Munich, Germany) between April and July 2019. Patients completed a self-administered questionnaire on the popularity and usefulness of STD-related apps. Descriptive analysis was performed with expression of categorical variables such as frequencies and percentages. For continuous variables, the median and range were indicated. Contingency tables and chi²-tests were performed to investigate associations between sociodemographic data and selected items of the questionnaire.

Results:

A total of 226 patients were surveyed (71.0% heterosexual, 22.8% homosexual, 6.2% bisexual). Nearly half of the patients (45.3%) specifically considered STD-related apps useful, 47.8% voted that they could supplement or support the consultation of a physician. Interestingly, only 35.1% preferred a printed patient brochure on STD’s over downloading and using an app but 64.0% would download an STD-related app recommended by their physician. General information regarding STD’s (55.7%), evaluation of skin diseases based on photos or videos (53.3%), information on the prevention of STD’s (45.5%), mediation of nearby contact points or test sites (44.3%), anonymous medical advice (41.3%), and calculation of the risk of having an STD (37.3%) were rated as most important features. Male sex was associated with a high willingness to use (P = 0.006) and pay (P = 0.01) for STD-related apps. Patients aged <40 years would rather download an app recommended by their physician (P = 0.03), whereas patients older than 40 years preferred reading a patient brochure on STD’s (P = 0.02).

Conclusions:

This study demonstrates a high general interest in the use of STD-related apps. In particular, young age and male sex were significantly associated with a positive perception, underlining the high potential of apps in the prevention and early recognition of STD’s in this high risk population.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Patient Perception of Mobile Phone Apps for the Care and Prevention of Sexually Transmitted Diseases: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(11):e16517

DOI: 10.2196/16517

PMID: 33170133

PMCID: 7685917

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.