Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Oct 3, 2019
Date Accepted: Mar 21, 2020
Date Submitted to PubMed: Mar 30, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Engaging Patients and Professionals to Evaluate the Seriousness of Maternal and Child Health Outcomes: Protocol for a Modified Delphi Study

Bodnar L, Khodykov D, Himes K, Burke J, Parisi S, Hutcheon J

Engaging Patients and Professionals to Evaluate the Seriousness of Maternal and Child Health Outcomes: Protocol for a Modified Delphi Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2020;9(6):e16478

DOI: 10.2196/16478

PMID: 32222699

PMCID: 7298634

Engaging Patients and Professionals to Evaluate the Seriousness of Maternal and Child Health Outcomes: A Research Protocol

  • Lisa Bodnar; 
  • Dmitry Khodykov; 
  • Katherine Himes; 
  • Jessica Burke; 
  • Sara Parisi; 
  • Jennifer Hutcheon

ABSTRACT

Background:

Maternal weight gain during pregnancy is one of the few potentially modifiable risk factors for many adverse maternal and child health outcomes. Defining optimal pregnancy weight gain ranges is difficult because while lower weight gain may prevent some outcomes, such as maternal and child obesity, it may increase the risk of others, such as fetal growth restriction and infant death. These health outcomes vary in their seriousness to mothers and their health-care providers, and these differences in seriousness should be taken into account when determining optimal weight gain ranges. However, the relative seriousness that women and their care providers place on different health outcomes is unknown.

Objective:

We will determine the seriousness of 11 maternal and child health outcomes that have been consistently associated with pregnancy weight gain. We will achieve this by engaging patients and maternal and child health professionals using an online modified-Delphi panel process.

Methods:

We will recruit a racially/ethnically and geographically diverse group of 90 U.S. maternal and child health professionals and 90 women who are pregnant or less than 2 years postpartum. We will conduct 3 concurrent panels using the ExpertLens system—a previously evaluated online modified-Delphi system that combines two rounds of rating with a round of feedback and moderated online discussion. In Round 1, panelists will be asked to rate the seriousness of each health outcome on a scale of 0 to 100 and to provide a rationale for their scores. In Round 2, panelists will review their responses relative to those of other panelists. They will discuss their seriousness ratings anonymously using a moderated online discussion board. In Round 3, participants will revise their Round 1 responses based on group feedback and discussion. Each round will be open 1 to 2 weeks.

Results:

The study protocol was reviewed by our ethics boards and was determined to be not human subject research. A pilot study of 6 professionals and 6 patients has been completed. The projected study completion date is December 2019.

Conclusions:

Our numeric estimates of the seriousness of maternal and child health outcomes will enable future studies to determine pregnancy weight gain ranges that balance the risks of low and high weight gain for mothers and children.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Bodnar L, Khodykov D, Himes K, Burke J, Parisi S, Hutcheon J

Engaging Patients and Professionals to Evaluate the Seriousness of Maternal and Child Health Outcomes: Protocol for a Modified Delphi Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2020;9(6):e16478

DOI: 10.2196/16478

PMID: 32222699

PMCID: 7298634

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.