Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Sep 30, 2019
Date Accepted: Mar 21, 2020
Date Submitted to PubMed: Apr 29, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Detection of Atrial Fibrillation Using a Ring-Type Wearable Device (CardioTracker) and Deep Learning Analysis of Photoplethysmography Signals: Prospective Observational Proof-of-Concept Study

Kwon S, Hong J, Choi EK, Lee B, Baik C, Lee E, Jeong ER, Koo BK, Oh S, Yi Y

Detection of Atrial Fibrillation Using a Ring-Type Wearable Device (CardioTracker) and Deep Learning Analysis of Photoplethysmography Signals: Prospective Observational Proof-of-Concept Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(5):e16443

DOI: 10.2196/16443

PMID: 32348254

PMCID: 7273241

A Ring-type Wearable Device Using Deep Learning Analysis of Photoplethysmographic Signals for Detecting Atrial Fibrillation: A Proof-of-Concept Study

  • Soonil Kwon; 
  • Joonki Hong; 
  • Eue-Keun Choi; 
  • Byunghwan Lee; 
  • Changhyun Baik; 
  • Euijae Lee; 
  • Eui-Rim Jeong; 
  • Bon-Kwon Koo; 
  • Seil Oh; 
  • Yung Yi

ABSTRACT

Background:

Continuous monitoring of photoplethysmography (PPG) with a wearable device may aid early detection of atrial fibrillation (AF).

Objective:

We developed a ring-type wearable device (CART) to detect AF using deep learning analysis of PPG signals.

Methods:

Patients with persistent AF who underwent cardioversion were recruited prospectively. We recorded PPG signals at the finger with the CART and a conventional pulse oximeter before and after cardioversion over 15 min with each instrument. Cardiologists validated the PPG rhythms with simultaneous single-lead electrocardiograms. The PPG data were transmitted to a smartphone wirelessly and analyzed with a deep learning algorithm.

Results:

From 100 study participants, the CART generated a total of 13,038 30-s-long PPG samples (5,850 for sinus rhythm and 7,188 for AF). Using the deep learning algorithm, its diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 96.9%, 99.0%, 94.3%, 95.6%, and 98.7%, respectively. Although the diagnostic accuracy decreased with shorter sample lengths, its accuracy was maintained at 94.7% with 10-s measurements. For sinus rhythm, the specificity decreased with higher variability of peak-to-peak intervals. However, for AF, the CART maintained consistent sensitivity, regardless of variability. Pulse rates had a relatively lesser impact on sensitivity than on specificity. Its performance was comparable to that of the conventional device when using proper thresholding.

Conclusions:

A ring-type wearable device with deep learning analysis of PPG signals could accurately diagnose AF without relying on electrocardiograms. With this device, continuous monitoring for AF among the high-risk population may be promising. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04023188.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Kwon S, Hong J, Choi EK, Lee B, Baik C, Lee E, Jeong ER, Koo BK, Oh S, Yi Y

Detection of Atrial Fibrillation Using a Ring-Type Wearable Device (CardioTracker) and Deep Learning Analysis of Photoplethysmography Signals: Prospective Observational Proof-of-Concept Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(5):e16443

DOI: 10.2196/16443

PMID: 32348254

PMCID: 7273241

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.