Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Education

Date Submitted: Sep 29, 2019
Date Accepted: Apr 19, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Mapping eHealth Education: Review of eHealth Content in Health and Medical Degrees at a Metropolitan Tertiary Institute in Australia

Keep M, Janssen A, McGregor D, Brunner M, Baysari MT, Quinn D, Shaw T

Mapping eHealth Education: Review of eHealth Content in Health and Medical Degrees at a Metropolitan Tertiary Institute in Australia

JMIR Med Educ 2021;7(3):e16440

DOI: 10.2196/16440

PMID: 34420920

PMCID: 8414287

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

eHealthMap: A review of eHealth teaching in health and medical degrees in Australia

  • Melanie Keep; 
  • Anna Janssen; 
  • Deborah McGregor; 
  • Melissa Brunner; 
  • Melissa Therese Baysari; 
  • Deleana Quinn; 
  • Tim Shaw

ABSTRACT

Background:

As digital technology use in society increases, so does the need for health professionals to engage in eHealth-enabled clinical practice. To do so, higher education institutions need to suitably prepare graduates of health professional degrees with the capabilities required to practice in eHealth contexts.

Objective:

This study aimed to understand how eHealth is taught at a major Australian University, and the challenges and suggestions for integrating eHealth into allied health, nursing and medical university curricula.

Methods:

Cross-disciplinary subject unit outlines (N=77) were reviewed for eHealth-related content, and interviews and focus groups conducted with the corresponding subject unit coordinators (N=26). Content analysis was used to identify themes around challenges and opportunities for embedding eHealth in teaching.

Results:

There was no evidence of a standardised approach to eHealth teaching across any of the health degrees at the university. Where eHealth content existed, it tended to focus on clinical applications rather than systems and policies, data analysis and knowledge creation, or system and technology implementation. Despite identifying numerous challenges to embedding eHealth in their subjects, unit coordinators expressed enthusiasm for eHealth teaching and were keen to adjust content and learning activities.

Conclusions:

Explicit strategies are required to address how eHealth capabilities can be embedded across clinical health degrees. Unit coordinators require support including access to relevant information, teaching resources, and curriculum mapping that clearly articulates eHealth capabilities for students across their degree. Degree-wide conversations and collaboration is required between professional bodes, clinical practice, and the universities for overcoming the practical and perceived challenges of integrating eHealth in health curricula.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Keep M, Janssen A, McGregor D, Brunner M, Baysari MT, Quinn D, Shaw T

Mapping eHealth Education: Review of eHealth Content in Health and Medical Degrees at a Metropolitan Tertiary Institute in Australia

JMIR Med Educ 2021;7(3):e16440

DOI: 10.2196/16440

PMID: 34420920

PMCID: 8414287

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.