Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health

Date Submitted: Sep 20, 2019
Date Accepted: Apr 2, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The VOICES Typology of Curatorial Decisions in Narrative Collections of the Lived Experiences of Mental Health Service Use, Recovery, or Madness: Qualitative Study

Yeo C, Hare-Duke L, Rennick-Egglestone S, Bradstreet S, Callard F, Hui A, Llewellyn-Beardsley J, Longden E, McDonough TA, McGranahan R, Ng F, Pollock K, Roe J, Slade M

The VOICES Typology of Curatorial Decisions in Narrative Collections of the Lived Experiences of Mental Health Service Use, Recovery, or Madness: Qualitative Study

JMIR Ment Health 2020;7(9):e16290

DOI: 10.2196/16290

PMID: 32945771

PMCID: 7532459

The VOICES typology of curatorial decisions in narrative collections of the lived experiences of mental health service use, recovery or madness: Qualitative study

  • Caroline Yeo; 
  • Laurie Hare-Duke; 
  • Stefan Rennick-Egglestone; 
  • Simon Bradstreet; 
  • Felicity Callard; 
  • Ada Hui; 
  • Joy Llewellyn-Beardsley; 
  • Eleanor Longden; 
  • Tracy A. McDonough; 
  • Rose McGranahan; 
  • Fiona Ng; 
  • Kristian Pollock; 
  • James Roe; 
  • Mike Slade

ABSTRACT

Background:

Narrative collections are increasingly used in health research and medical practice. However there is limited research concerning the decision making processes in curating narrative collections, and of the strategies curators employ as they build and publish collections.

Objective:

The objectives of this study were to develop a typology of curatorial decisions involved in curating narrative collections presenting lived experiences of mental health service use, recovery or madness, and to characterise existing practices used in relation to each identified curatorial decision.

Methods:

A preliminary typology was developed by synthesising and refining the results from a systematic review through iterative consultation with an experienced curator of recovery narratives. The preliminary typology was used as the basis for semi structured interviews conducted with a maximum variation sample of 30 curators from 7 different countries of narrative collections of the lived experiences of mental health service use, recovery or madness. Thematic analysis was conducted by a multidisciplinary team.

Results:

The final typology identified six curatorial decision-making themes, giving the acronym VOICES: Values and motivations, Organisation, Inclusion and exclusion, Control and collaboration, Ethics and legal, Safety and wellbeing. Strategies relating to each decision-making theme were identified.

Conclusions:

The VOICES typology identifies certain key decisions to consider when curating narrative collections. The VOICES typology could be used as a decision aid tool for this increasingly popular process and will advance the field. It might also help open up additional arenas for enquiry and debate over the curation of mental health recovery narratives that have not been captured here. Future research could use the VOICES typology as a theoretical basis for a good practice resource, to support curators in their efforts to balance the challenges and sometimes conflicting imperatives involved in collecting, organising and sharing narratives.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Yeo C, Hare-Duke L, Rennick-Egglestone S, Bradstreet S, Callard F, Hui A, Llewellyn-Beardsley J, Longden E, McDonough TA, McGranahan R, Ng F, Pollock K, Roe J, Slade M

The VOICES Typology of Curatorial Decisions in Narrative Collections of the Lived Experiences of Mental Health Service Use, Recovery, or Madness: Qualitative Study

JMIR Ment Health 2020;7(9):e16290

DOI: 10.2196/16290

PMID: 32945771

PMCID: 7532459

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.