Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Sep 12, 2019
Date Accepted: Mar 23, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

The Acceptability and Usability of Digital Health Interventions for Adults With Depression, Anxiety, and Somatoform Disorders: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis

Patel S, Akhtar A, Malins S, Wright N, Rowley E, Young E, Sampson S, Morriss R

The Acceptability and Usability of Digital Health Interventions for Adults With Depression, Anxiety, and Somatoform Disorders: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(7):e16228

DOI: 10.2196/16228

PMID: 32628116

PMCID: 7381032

Acceptability and Usability of Digital Health Interventions for Adults with Depressive, Anxiety and Somatoform Disorders: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-synthesis

  • Shireen Patel; 
  • Athfah Akhtar; 
  • Sam Malins; 
  • Nicola Wright; 
  • Emma Rowley; 
  • Emma Young; 
  • Stephanie Sampson; 
  • Richard Morriss

ABSTRACT

Background:

The prevalence of mental health problems continues to rise with almost 4% of the world population having an anxiety disorder and almost 3.5% having depression in 2017. Despite the high prevalence only one third of people with depression or anxiety receive treatment. Over the last decade the use of digital health interventions has risen rapidly as a means of accessing mental health care and continues to increase. Although there is evidence supporting the effectiveness of digital health interventions (DHIs) for the treatment of mental health conditions, little is known about what aspects are valued by users and how they might be improved.

Objective:

This systematic review aims to identify, appraise and synthesise the qualitative literature available on service-users’ views and experiences regarding the acceptability and usability of DHIs for depressive, anxiety and somatoform disorders.

Methods:

A systematic search strategy was developed and searches were run in seven electronic databases. Qualitative and mixed-methods studies published in English were included. Meta-synthesis was used to interpret and synthesise the findings from the included studies.

Results:

Twenty-four studies were included in the meta-synthesis. Three key themes emerged with descriptive subthemes. The three key themes were; (1) Initial motivations and approaches to DHIs, (2) Personalisation of treatment and (3) The value of receiving personal support in DHIs. The meta-synthesis suggests that participants’ initial beliefs about DHIs can have an important effect on their engagement with these types of interventions. Personal support was valued very highly as a major component of DHIs success or otherwise. The main reason for this was the way it enabled individual personalisation of care.

Conclusions:

Findings from the systematic review have implications for the design of future digital health interventions to improve uptake, retention and outcome to DHIs for depressive, anxiety and somatoform disorders. DHIs need to be personalised to the specific needs of the individual. Future research should explore if the findings could be generalised.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Patel S, Akhtar A, Malins S, Wright N, Rowley E, Young E, Sampson S, Morriss R

The Acceptability and Usability of Digital Health Interventions for Adults With Depression, Anxiety, and Somatoform Disorders: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(7):e16228

DOI: 10.2196/16228

PMID: 32628116

PMCID: 7381032

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.