Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Sep 11, 2019
Date Accepted: Jan 23, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Mobile Health for Pediatric Weight Management: Systematic Scoping Review

Tully L, Burls A, Sorensen J, El-Moslemany R, O'Malley G

Mobile Health for Pediatric Weight Management: Systematic Scoping Review

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(6):e16214

DOI: 10.2196/16214

PMID: 32490849

PMCID: 7301268

Studies investigating mHealth for pediatric weight management: a systematic scoping review

  • Louise Tully; 
  • Amanda Burls; 
  • Jan Sorensen; 
  • Riyad El-Moslemany; 
  • Grace O'Malley

ABSTRACT

Background:

The prevalence and consequences of obesity among children/adolescents remains a leading global public health concern, and evidence-based, multi-disciplinary lifestyle interventions are the cornerstone of treatment. Mobile electronic devices are widely used across socioeconomic categories, and may provide a means of extending the reach and efficiency of healthcare interventions.

Objective:

We aimed to synthesize the evidence regarding mobile health for treatment of childhood overweight and obesity, in order to map the breadth and nature of the literature in this field and describe the characteristics of published studies.

Methods:

We conducted a systematic scoping review in line with PRISMA-ScR guidance, by searching nine academic databases in addition to grey literature for studies describing acceptability, usability, feasibility, effectiveness, adherence, or cost-effectiveness of interventions assessing mHealth for childhood obesity treatment. We also hand searched reference lists of relevant articles. Studies aimed at prevention of overweight/obesity were excluded, as were studies whereby mHealth was not the primary mode of treatment delivery for at least one study arm, or was not independently assessed. A random portion of all abstracts and full texts were double screened by a second reviewer to ensure consistency. Data were charted according to study characteristics including design, participants, intervention content, behavior change theory underpinning the study, mode of delivery and outcome(s) measured.

Results:

We identified 42 eligible studies assessing acceptability (n=7), usability (n=2), feasibility/pilot studies (n=15), treatment effect (n=17) and fidelity (n=1). Change in BMI z-scores/percentiles was most commonly measured, among a variety of dietary, physical activity, psychological and usability/acceptability measures. SMS, mobile applications and wearable devices make up the majority of mobile interventions and 69% of studies specified a behavior change theory used.

Conclusions:

Pediatric weight management using mHealth is an emerging field, with most work to date aimed at developing and piloting such interventions. Few large trials are published, and these are heterogeneous in nature and rarely reported according to eCONSORT guidelines. There is an evidence gap for cost-effectiveness analyses of such studies.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Tully L, Burls A, Sorensen J, El-Moslemany R, O'Malley G

Mobile Health for Pediatric Weight Management: Systematic Scoping Review

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(6):e16214

DOI: 10.2196/16214

PMID: 32490849

PMCID: 7301268

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.