Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Sep 3, 2019
Date Accepted: Dec 14, 2019

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Mobile App Support for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Development and Usability Study

Müller S, Lauridsen KG, Palic AH, Frederiksen LN, Mathiasen M, Løfgren B

Mobile App Support for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Development and Usability Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(1):e16114

DOI: 10.2196/16114

PMID: 33399539

PMCID: 7815448

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Mobile App Support for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Eliciting User Requirements Using the Kano Model

  • Sune Müller; 
  • Kasper Glerup Lauridsen; 
  • Amra Hadrovic Palic; 
  • Lotte Nygaard Frederiksen; 
  • Morten Mathiasen; 
  • Bo Løfgren

ABSTRACT

Background:

The user requirements for in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) support applications (apps) is understudied. To study usability, functionality, and design based on user requirements, we applied a mixed-methods research design using interviews, observations, and a Kano questionnaire to survey perspectives of both physicians and nurses.

Objective:

This study aims to identify what an in-hospital CPR support app should include to meet the requirements and expectations of healthcare professionals by evaluating the “CprPrototype” app.

Methods:

We used a mixed-methods research design. The qualitative methods consist of semi-structured interviews and observations from an advanced life support (ALS) course; both provided input to the subsequent questionnaire development. The quantitative method is a questionnaire based on the Kano model classifying user requirements as “Must-be,” “One-dimensional” (attributes causing satisfaction when present and dissatisfaction when absent), “Attractive,” “Indifferent,” and “Reverse” (attributes causing dissatisfaction when present and satisfaction when absent). The questionnaire was supplemented with comment fields. All respondents were physicians and nurses providing ALS at hospitals in the Central Denmark Region.

Results:

In total, 83 responded to the questionnaire, 15 physicians and nurses were observed during ALS training, and five physicians were interviewed. Based on the Kano questionnaire, 53% of requirements were classified as “Indifferent,” 29% as “Attractive,” and 18% as “One-dimensional.” The comments revealed seven different categories of user requirements with noticeable differences between physicians and nurses: “Technological challenges,” “keep track of time,” “documentation/history,” “disturbing element,” “improvement areas: functions,” “improvement areas: design,” and “better guidance.”

Conclusions:

The study provides recommendations to developers on the user requirements that need to be addressed when developing CPR support apps. Three features (“One-dimensional” attributes) must be incorporated in an in-hospital CPR support app: “Reminder of rhythm check,” “Reminder of resuscitation drugs,” and “Differentiate between adults and children.” Five additional features (“Attractive” attributes) result in higher user satisfaction: “All functions on one side,” “access to the patient journal in the app,” “automatic time recording when cardiac arrest is called,” “sound to guide the chest compression rate (metronome),” and “send CPR history to the DANARREST database.”


 Citation

Please cite as:

Müller S, Lauridsen KG, Palic AH, Frederiksen LN, Mathiasen M, Løfgren B

Mobile App Support for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Development and Usability Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021;9(1):e16114

DOI: 10.2196/16114

PMID: 33399539

PMCID: 7815448

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.