Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Aug 27, 2019
Date Accepted: Mar 23, 2020
Date Submitted to PubMed: May 27, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Intra-Rater and Inter-Rater Reliability of Tongue Coating Diagnosis in Traditional Chinese Medicine Using Smartphones: Quasi-Delphi Study

Wang ZC, ZHANG SP, YUEN PC, TCM Tongue Diagnosis Group

Intra-Rater and Inter-Rater Reliability of Tongue Coating Diagnosis in Traditional Chinese Medicine Using Smartphones: Quasi-Delphi Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(7):e16018

DOI: 10.2196/16018

PMID: 32459647

PMCID: 7380897

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of tongue coating diagnosis in traditional Chinese medicine using smartphone

  • Zhi Chun Wang; 
  • Shi Ping ZHANG; 
  • Pong Chi YUEN; 
  • TCM Tongue Diagnosis Group

ABSTRACT

Background:

There is a growing trend in the use of mobile health (mHealth) technologies in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). Tongue diagnosis is an important procedure of TCM diagnosis, but its reliability in smartphone application has yet to be evaluated.

Objective:

This study aimed to determine the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of tongue coating diagnosis using a quasi-Delphic process in a series of experiments.

Methods:

First, an operating classification scheme of tongue coating were formed through the analysis of 2023 tongue images by two groups of assessors. Then a representative tongue image set was evaluated by a group of clinicians based on their own interpretations as well as on an operating classification scheme using online questionnaires. Then clinicians in the study group each took tongue images of their patients and rated the tongue features according to their direct visual inspection and indirect tongue image inspection. Using the finalized operating classification scheme, clinicians of the study group (n=17) assessed representative tongue images (n=24) taken by themselves, and the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of their assessments were evaluated.

Results:

Intra-rater reliability of tongue image assessments were good to very good (Cohen’s Kappa between 0.7-1.0), except for the color of tongue body and for slippery tongue fur. Inter-rater reliability was moderate for tongue coating (Gwet’s AC2 between 0.49-0.55), and fair for color and features of tongue body (Gwet’s AC2: 0.34).

Conclusions:

Taken together, our study has shown that tongue images collected via smartphone contain some reliable features that can be used in mHealth analysis, especially for those related to tongue coating. Our findings thus support the use of smartphone for detecting changes in tongue coating in telemedicine and mHealth.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Wang ZC, ZHANG SP, YUEN PC, TCM Tongue Diagnosis Group

Intra-Rater and Inter-Rater Reliability of Tongue Coating Diagnosis in Traditional Chinese Medicine Using Smartphones: Quasi-Delphi Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(7):e16018

DOI: 10.2196/16018

PMID: 32459647

PMCID: 7380897

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.