Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Research Protocols

Date Submitted: Aug 17, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 17, 2019 - Aug 26, 2019
Date Accepted: Nov 26, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Developing an Evidence-Based Nursing Handover Standard for a Multi-Site Public Hospital in Switzerland: Protocol for a Web-Based, Modified Delphi Study

Tacchini-Jacquier N, de Waele E, Urben P, Turini P, Verloo H

Developing an Evidence-Based Nursing Handover Standard for a Multi-Site Public Hospital in Switzerland: Protocol for a Web-Based, Modified Delphi Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2020;9(1):e15910

DOI: 10.2196/15910

PMID: 31913133

PMCID: 6996777

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

An e-Delphi study protocol to develop an evidence-based nursing handover standard for a multi-site public hospital in Switzerland

  • Nadine Tacchini-Jacquier; 
  • Els de Waele; 
  • Peter Urben; 
  • Pierre Turini; 
  • Henk Verloo

ABSTRACT

Background:

Inadequate or non-existent clinical handovers, or failures to transfer information, responsibility, and accountability can have extremely serious consequences for hospitalized patients.

Objective:

To build a consensus, evidence-based, nursing handover standard for inpatients during shift changes or internal transfers between hospital wards and based on the papers by Slade et al. (2014, 2016).

Methods:

This protocol describes a mixed-methods design using a modified Delphi data-collection survey and involving a targeted panel sample of about 300 nurse experts. A multi-round survey will select this quasi-anonymized panel from a multi-site public hospital in Switzerland. Each survey stage will be described and will build on the previous one. The study will end with a cognitive debriefing involving a focus group discussion with a randomly selected panel deciding on which items should and should not be accepted for the evidence-based clinical nursing handover standard. An item must achieve a consensus of ≥ 70% for inclusion.

Results:

The present study’s expected outcome is a consensus-built, evidence-based nursing handover standard for inpatients during shift changes or internal transfers between the wards of a multi-site public hospital in Switzerland. The first round’s expected outcomes will be the selection of numerous items about which the panel was in agreement and a list of items about which it could not find a consensus. The second round’s expected outcomes will be a final selection of the items about which the panel was in agreement and a list of items about which no agreement could be found (i.e., topics rejected for inclusion in the handover standard). The third round of the e-Delphi process will be a cognitive debriefing involving a focus group discussing the consensus/non-consensus items in the nursing shift handover and patient transfer standard.

Conclusions:

This survey will enable us to develop an evidence-based nursing handover standard for use during shift changes and internal inpatient transfers in a multi-site public hospital in Switzerland. Clinical Trial: not applicable


 Citation

Please cite as:

Tacchini-Jacquier N, de Waele E, Urben P, Turini P, Verloo H

Developing an Evidence-Based Nursing Handover Standard for a Multi-Site Public Hospital in Switzerland: Protocol for a Web-Based, Modified Delphi Study

JMIR Res Protoc 2020;9(1):e15910

DOI: 10.2196/15910

PMID: 31913133

PMCID: 6996777

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.