Previously submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research (no longer under consideration since Mar 19, 2020)
Date Submitted: Aug 4, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 3, 2019 - Sep 28, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Do I know that I do not know? Results of a survey on health literacy in a cohort of 414 elderly people in Italy
ABSTRACT
Background:
Health literacy is widely recognised as an important social determinant of health, although it is difficult to measure it at national, regional and local level.
Objective:
This study aims to measure the level of health information literacy in a sample of elderly people living in the city of Pescara (Central Italy). Besides, the level of health information literacy, as an integral part of health literacy, was checked among the people surveyed.
Methods:
The study was conducted through a questionnaire during an eye screening in a cohort of elderly people in 2017. The targeted audience included 595 individuals (60 and over years of age); 414 questionnaires were eligible for examination. The questionnaire was organised into two sections, the first one was set up by the authors of this paper, whilst the second one was based on the European Health Literacy Survey (HLS-EU).
Results:
Data collected refer to the number of respondents per question, as a matter of fact not all surveyed people (414) answered to each question. Most respondents (283 out of 411) were women (69 %). The sample revealed low education level: only 9% had a degree and/or post-doc; 25% had a high school diploma, 39% attended only primary school and 27% junior high school. The family doctor was the preferred source to get information from, Internet was the less used source (22%, 91 out of 414). Most participants sought information in Italian. As regards the subject of information retrieved, the answers collected (90) highlighted that the majority of respondents looked for information on diseases in general (94%), on therapies (77%), on nutrition issues (74%), and on diagnosis (69%). A good percentage looks for information on drugs (50%) and on health facilities (44%). Most of them also declared that they easily understand what their practitioner says. Besides, they claimed they did not find any difficulty in understanding medicines’ labels and drug prescriptions, or to cope with other health conditions.
Conclusions:
This survey addressed a homogeneous group of elderly people living in a small area of Central Italy. Most respondents declared to address family and/or specialist doctors for health information, and just a minor percentage (22%) also declared they surf the Internet, mainly through search engines, claiming to be rather satisfied with results without questioning their reliability. Most respondents declared to have an easy access and understanding of health information. Yet the study results showed that respondents were not aware of that information overload requires critical skills in order to select trusted and updated medical information. Health information literacy is difficult to measure; this survey shows the need of further investigation and the use of standardised measuring tools. It is also fundamental to promote corrective strategies, like prescription of information (Information RX) or creation of quality health portals in native languages (e.g. ISSalute) and to offer professional support (patient’s libraries or information points) for improving health literacy levels.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.