Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Jul 23, 2019
Date Accepted: Oct 2, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Use of Different Food Image Recognition Platforms in Dietary Assessment: Comparison Study

Van Asbroeck S, Matthys C

Use of Different Food Image Recognition Platforms in Dietary Assessment: Comparison Study

JMIR Form Res 2020;4(12):e15602

DOI: 10.2196/15602

PMID: 33284118

PMCID: 7752530

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Automated Image Recognition for Food: are we there yet?

  • Stephanie Van Asbroeck; 
  • Christophe Matthys

ABSTRACT

In the domain of dietary assessment, there has been an increasing amount of critique on memory-based techniques such as food frequency questionnaires or 24h recalls. One alternative is logging pictures of consumed food followed by an automatic image recognition analysis that provides information on type and amount of food in the picture. However, it is currently unknown how well image recognition platforms perform and whether they could indeed be used for dietary assessment. Therefore, we conducted a performance study of currently available image recognition platforms. A variety of foods and beverages was photographed in a range of standardized settings. All pictures (n=185) were fed into selected recognition platforms (n=7) and estimates were saved. Accuracy was determined along with totality of the estimate in the case of multiple component dishes. Top 1 accuracies ranged from 63% for Calorie Mama APIĀ® to 9% for Google Vision APIĀ®. None of the platforms were capable of estimating the amount of food. These results demonstrate that certain platforms perform poorly while others perform decently. Nevertheless, important obstacles such as the accurate estimation of food quantity need to be overcome before these platforms can be used as a real alternative for traditional dietary assessment methods.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Van Asbroeck S, Matthys C

Use of Different Food Image Recognition Platforms in Dietary Assessment: Comparison Study

JMIR Form Res 2020;4(12):e15602

DOI: 10.2196/15602

PMID: 33284118

PMCID: 7752530

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.