Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health
Date Submitted: Aug 4, 2019
Date Accepted: Apr 13, 2021
Date Submitted to PubMed: Nov 28, 2022
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Differential Importance of YouTube Suicide Prevention Videos After a Wave of Student Suicides: Typology and Social Media Metrics Analysis
ABSTRACT
Background:
There is a growing trend of promoting suicide prevention in YouTube, but it is yet to know the types and characteristics of videos that can engage the audience effectively.
Objective:
This study aimed to examine how YouTube was used and its impacts in response to the recent spate of student suicides in Hong Kong.
Methods:
We conducted content and network analyses on the videos’ impact metrics and studied the comments on the videos related to the student suicides during the 2015/2016 school year.
Results:
162 relevant YouTube videos by seven types of stakeholders were identified. Those top and popular YouTubers disclosing personal experiences of overcoming suicide risk (Papageno effect) generated significantly greater impacts. The influential YouTubers’ suicide prevention videos attracted different groups of viewers and generated more interactions among their viewers.
Conclusions:
Influential YouTubers’ self-disclosure videos have a larger impact on youth suicide prevention.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.