Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.
Who will be affected?
Readers: No access to all 28 journals. We recommend accessing our articles via PubMed Central
Authors: No access to the submission form or your user account.
Reviewers: No access to your user account. Please download manuscripts you are reviewing for offline reading before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Editors: No access to your user account to assign reviewers or make decisions.
Copyeditors: No access to user account. Please download manuscripts you are copyediting before Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 7:00 PM.
Jones MT, Heiden E, Fogg C, Meredith P, Smith G, Sayer N, Toft L, Williams E, Williams M, Brown T, Gates J, Lodge D, Bassett P, Lyons-Amos M, Chauhan M, Begum S, Rason M, Winter J, Longstaff J, Chauhan AJ
An Evaluation of Agreement of Breathing Rates Measured by a Novel Device, Manual Counting, and Other Techniques Used in Clinical Practice: Protocol for the Observational VENTILATE Study
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
An evaluation of agreement of breathing rates measured by a novel device, manual counting and other techniques used in clinical practice: Protocol for the VENTILATE Study
Matthew T Jones;
Emily Heiden;
Carole Fogg;
Paul Meredith;
Gary Smith;
Nicola Sayer;
Lisa Toft;
Emma Williams;
Matthew Williams;
Thomas Brown;
Jessica Gates;
David Lodge;
Paul Bassett;
Mark Lyons-Amos;
Milan Chauhan;
Selina Begum;
Maddie Rason;
Jonathon Winter;
Jayne Longstaff;
Anoop J Chauhan
ABSTRACT
Background:
Respiratory Rate (RR) is the most sensitive physiological observation to predict clinical deterioration on hospital wards and poor clinical monitoring has been highlighted as a primary contributor to avoidable mortality. Patients in Intensive Care have their RR monitored continuously but this equipment is rarely available on general hospital wards.
Objective:
The primary objective is to assess the accuracy of the RespiraSense device in comparison to other methods currently used in clinical practice. The secondary objective is to assess the accuracy of the RespiraSense device in participants in different positions and when reading aloud.
Methods:
A single-centre, prospective observational study will investigate the agreement of the RespiraSense device as compared to other device measurements (capnography, electrocardiogram [ECG]) and the current standard measurement of RR (manual counting by a trained healthcare professional). The different methods will be employed concurrently on the same participant as part of a single study visit.
Results:
This study has not yet begun recruitment. It is expected to complete data collection approximately 2 months after opening.
Conclusions:
The VENTILATE study will provide further validation of the use of the RespiraSense device in subjects with abnormal respiratory rates.
Citation
Please cite as:
Jones MT, Heiden E, Fogg C, Meredith P, Smith G, Sayer N, Toft L, Williams E, Williams M, Brown T, Gates J, Lodge D, Bassett P, Lyons-Amos M, Chauhan M, Begum S, Rason M, Winter J, Longstaff J, Chauhan AJ
An Evaluation of Agreement of Breathing Rates Measured by a Novel Device, Manual Counting, and Other Techniques Used in Clinical Practice: Protocol for the Observational VENTILATE Study