Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health
Date Submitted: Jun 14, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 17, 2019 - Jun 29, 2019
Date Accepted: Jul 9, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Is OMBSR feasible and acceptable for lesbian, gay, and bisexual women and men? A pilot study
ABSTRACT
Background:
In conservative rural areas, including Appalachian Tennessee, anti-discrimination laws do not exist, and lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) people in this region are at risk for excess stress due to discrimination. Stress-reducing interventions delivered via innovative channels to overcome access barriers are needed.
Objective:
This study investigated the feasibility and acceptability of online mindfulness-based stress reduction (OMBSR) with LGB people in Appalachian Tennessee.
Methods:
We ran two consecutive pilot studies involving pre- post- test designs. Participants completed 8-weeks of OMBSR, weekly activity logs, semi-structured interviews, and quantitative surveys of perceived and minority stress.
Results:
24 LGB people enrolled in and 17 completed OMBSR. 94% completed some form of mindfulness activities daily, including meditation. Participants’ enjoyed the program and found it easy to use. Time to complete daily activities was cited as the most common barrier to participation. Participants suggested that the program should be adapted to include a social component; this suggestion varied by gender. Women requested a digital social component to increase social connectedness between LGB women and for asking OMBSR-related questions of peers and researchers. Men requested an in-person social component to support accountability for daily mindfulness activities and program continuation over time. Participants’ qualitatively reported decreased stress and anxiety. Quantitative results demonstrated that perceived stress decreased 23% (women: M = 22.73 vs. M = 17.45; t = 3.12, p = 0.01) and 40% (men: M = 19.83 vs. M = 12.00; t = 3.90, p = 0.01) between baseline and post-program. Women demonstrated a 12% reduction in overall minority stress from baseline to 12-week follow-up (M = 1.87 vs. M = 1.57; t = 4.12, p = .002). Subscale analyses indicated that, women’s stress due to vigilance decreased 21% between baseline and 12-week follow-up (M = 2.24 vs. M = 1.77; t = 4.20, p = 0.002). Women’s stress arising from vicarious trauma decreased 20% from baseline to post-program (M = 4.21 vs. M = 3.36; t = 2.69, p = .02) and 26% from baseline to 12-week follow-up (M = 4.21 vs. M = 3.12; t = 3.67, p = 0.004).
Conclusions:
OMBSR was feasible and acceptable to LGB people in Appalachian Tennessee. OMBSR may be a useful tool to help LGB people reduce general and minority-specific stress in socially conservative regions lacking anti-discrimination policy.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.