Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: Jun 10, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 10, 2019 - Jun 18, 2019
Date Accepted: Aug 17, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Health professions digital education for antibiotic management: systematic review and meta-analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration
ABSTRACT
Background:
Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing is one of the key contributors to antibiotic resistance and could potentially be resolved with appropriate health professions education. Digital education has the potential to improve the quality of healthcare professionals’ antibiotic management.
Objective:
The objectives of this systematic review were to evaluate the effectiveness of digital education for antibiotic management compared with various controls in improving healthcare professionals’ knowledge, skills, attitudes, satisfaction, clinical practice, economic outcomes and patient-related outcomes.
Methods:
Seven electronic databases and two trial registries were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster RCTs published between January 1, 1990 and September 20, 2018. There were no language restrictions. We followed Cochrane methods to select studies, extract data and to appraise and synthesize eligible studies.
Results:
Six cluster RCTs and two RCTs with 655 primary healthcare practices, 1392 primary care physicians and 485,632 patients were included. The interventions included personal digital assistants, short text messages, online digital education including emails and websites, and online blended education which used a combination of online digital education and traditional education materials. The control groups received traditional education. Six studies assessed post-intervention clinical practice. The majority of the studies (4 out of 6 studies) reported greater reduction in antibiotics prescription or dispensing rate with digital education compared to traditional education. Two studies showed significant difference in post-intervention knowledge scores in favour of mobile education compared with traditional education [standardized mean difference (SMD)=1.09, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.28, I2=0%, large effect size, 491 participants (2 studies)]. The findings about healthcare professionals’ attitudes and patient-related outcomes were mixed or inconclusive. Three studies found digital education to be more cost-effective than traditional education. None of the included studies reported on skills, satisfaction or adverse effects.
Conclusions:
Our findings suggest that mobile digital education and/or online digital education (standalone or in blended format) on antibiotic management could improve primary care physicians’ post-intervention knowledge, clinical practice and be cost-effective particularly in post-registration scenarios. Future research should focus on the use of emerging technologies (such as serious games, virtual reality, and virtual patient simulations) in training healthcare professionals, within a range of settings (including low- and middle-income countries) and report on outcomes such as attitudes, skills, adverse effects, patient outcomes and economic impact.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.