Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jun 5, 2019
Date Accepted: Aug 21, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Implementing a Digital Tool to Support Shared Care Planning in Community-Based Mental Health Services: Qualitative Evaluation

Pithara C, Farr M, Sullivan SA, Edwards HB, Hall W, Gadd C, Walker J, Hebden N, Horwood J

Implementing a Digital Tool to Support Shared Care Planning in Community-Based Mental Health Services: Qualitative Evaluation

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(3):e14868

DOI: 10.2196/14868

PMID: 32191210

PMCID: 7118546

Implementing a digital tool to support shared care planning in community-based mental health services: A qualitative evaluation

  • Christalla Pithara; 
  • Michelle Farr; 
  • Sarah A Sullivan; 
  • Hannah B Edwards; 
  • Will Hall; 
  • Caroline Gadd; 
  • Julian Walker; 
  • Nick Hebden; 
  • Jeremy Horwood

ABSTRACT

Background:

Mental health services aim to provide recovery-focused care and facilitate co-produced care planning. In practice, mental health providers can find supporting individualised co-produced care with service users, whilst balancing administrative and performance demands, difficult. To help meet this aim and using principles of co-production, an innovative mobile digital Care Pathway Tool was developed to be used on a tablet computer and piloted in the West of England.

Objective:

To examine mental health care professionals’ views of and experiences with the Care Pathway Tool during the pilot implementation phase and identify factors influencing its implementation.

Methods:

Twenty in-depth telephone interviews with providers participating in the pilot, and managers in the host organisation. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, anonymised and thematically analysed guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Results:

The tool was thought to facilitate co-produced recovery-focused care planning, a policy and organisational, as well as professional priority. Internet connectivity issues, system inter-operability and access to service users’ health records affected use of the tool during mobile working. The organisation’s resources, such as IT infrustructure and staff time, and IT culture, influenced implementation. Participants’ levels of use of the tool was dependent on knowledge of the tool and self-efficacy; perceived service-user needs and characteristics; and perceptions of impact on the therapeutic relationship. Training and preparation time influenced participants’ confidence in using the tool.

Conclusions:

Findings highlight the importance for congruence between staff, organisation and external policy priorities and digital technologies to aid intervention engagement; and need for ongoing training and support of those intended to use the technology during and after the end of implementation interventions.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Pithara C, Farr M, Sullivan SA, Edwards HB, Hall W, Gadd C, Walker J, Hebden N, Horwood J

Implementing a Digital Tool to Support Shared Care Planning in Community-Based Mental Health Services: Qualitative Evaluation

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(3):e14868

DOI: 10.2196/14868

PMID: 32191210

PMCID: 7118546

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.