Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Mental Health

Date Submitted: May 29, 2019
Date Accepted: Feb 29, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evaluation of Electronic Mental Health Implementation in Northern Territory Services Using the Integrated “Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services” Framework: Qualitative Study

Raphiphatthana B, Sweet M, Puszka S, Whitty M, Dingwall K, Nagel T

Evaluation of Electronic Mental Health Implementation in Northern Territory Services Using the Integrated “Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services” Framework: Qualitative Study

JMIR Ment Health 2020;7(5):e14835

DOI: 10.2196/14835

PMID: 32452812

PMCID: 7284395

Evaluation of e-mental health implementation in Northern Territory services using the i-PARIHS framework

  • Buaphrao Raphiphatthana; 
  • Michelle Sweet; 
  • Stefanie Puszka; 
  • Megan Whitty; 
  • Kylie Dingwall; 
  • Tricia Nagel

ABSTRACT

Background:

e-Mental health (eMH) provides a promising strategy to bridge the treatment gap in mental healthcare. Training workshops have been delivered to service providers working with Indigenous Australians at a primary healthcare level to raise awareness and knowledge of e-mental health approaches.

Objective:

The present study aimed to understand service providers’ perspectives and experiences of eMH utilization. More specifically, it aimed to use the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework to further identify and understand how different factors facilitate and/or impede e-mental health uptake within primary healthcare settings servicing Indigenous Australians.

Methods:

Qualitative interviews were conducted with 57 service providers working with Indigenous Australians, who have undergone e-mental health training workshops.

Results:

A number of factors relating to the innovation (eMH approach), recipient (service providers as an individual and as a team) and context (local, organizational, and external contexts) were found to influence eMH uptake. Particularly, organizational readiness, in terms of IT resources and infrastructure, policies, workforce and culture, and processes to mandate eMH use, was found to be a significant impediment to eMH utilization. These findings led to the development of a three-phase implementation strategy which aims to enhance eMH adoption by addressing organizational readiness prior to and post eMH training.

Conclusions:

The i-PARIHS framework provided a useful theoretical guide which deepened our understanding of how different factors impede or facilitate e-mental health implementation in this setting. This insight was used to develop a practical and comprehensive facilitation strategy to enhance successful e-mental health implementation, involving three phases: pre-training consultations, training workshops and post-training follow-up support.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Raphiphatthana B, Sweet M, Puszka S, Whitty M, Dingwall K, Nagel T

Evaluation of Electronic Mental Health Implementation in Northern Territory Services Using the Integrated “Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services” Framework: Qualitative Study

JMIR Ment Health 2020;7(5):e14835

DOI: 10.2196/14835

PMID: 32452812

PMCID: 7284395

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.