Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: May 27, 2019
Date Accepted: Mar 12, 2020

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Evaluating the Quality of Health-Related WeChat Public Accounts: Cross-Sectional Study

Dan L, Weiwei S, Wei P, Zhiwei B, Xingzhi C, Fan Z, Fuzhi W

Evaluating the Quality of Health-Related WeChat Public Accounts: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(5):e14826

DOI: 10.2196/14826

PMID: 32383684

PMCID: 7244997

Quality of Health-related WeChat Public Accounts: Evaluation of HONcode Conformity and Article Suitability

  • Luo Dan; 
  • Sun Weiwei; 
  • Pan Wei; 
  • Bian Zhiwei; 
  • Chen Xingzhi; 
  • Zhang Fan; 
  • Wang Fuzhi

ABSTRACT

Background:

As a representative of health information communication platforms accessed through mobile phones and mobile terminals, health-related WeChat public accounts (HWPAs) have a large consumer group in the Chinese-speaking world. However, there is still a lack of general understanding on the status quo of HWPAs and the quality of the articles they release.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the HONcode conformity of HWPAs and evaluate the suitability of articles disseminated by HWPAs.

Methods:

Survey date: April 23-May 5, 2019. Based on the monthly (March 1-31, 2019) WeChat Index provided by Qingbo Big Data, the top 100 HWPAs were examined to evaluate their HONcode compliance. The first four articles published by each HWPA on the survey day were selected as samples for evaluating their suitability. All materials were assessed by three raters. The assessment tools were the HONcode checklist and SAM score sheet. Data analysis was completed with SPSS version 17.0 and Excel version 2013.

Results:

A total of 93 HWPAs and 210 articles that they had released were included in this study. For six of the eight principles, 93 HWPAs nearly consistently did not meet the requirements of the HONcode. The HWPAs certified by Tencent Corporation (66, 70.97%) were generally slightly superior to those without such certification (27, 29.03%) in terms of HONcode principles. The mean SAM score for the 210 articles was 67.72 (SD 10.930), which indicated “adequate” suitability. There was no significant difference in the SAM scores of the articles published by certified HWPAs and those published by uncertified HWPAs (P > .05), except in the literacy requirements dimension (t = -2.418, P = .02).

Conclusions:

The HWPAs had low HONcode conformity. Although the suitability of health information released by HWPAs was at a moderate level, there were still problems such as difficulty in tracing information sources, overflow of implicit advertisements, and irregular usage of charts. Meanwhile, the low approval requirements of HWPAs were not conducive to improving their service quality.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Dan L, Weiwei S, Wei P, Zhiwei B, Xingzhi C, Fan Z, Fuzhi W

Evaluating the Quality of Health-Related WeChat Public Accounts: Cross-Sectional Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(5):e14826

DOI: 10.2196/14826

PMID: 32383684

PMCID: 7244997

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.