Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: May 25, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: May 28, 2019 - Jun 11, 2019
Date Accepted: Aug 21, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Postinjury Complications: Retrospective Study of Causative Factors


Warnack E, Pachter HL, Choi B, DiMaggio C, Frangos S, Klein M, Bukur M

Postinjury Complications: Retrospective Study of Causative Factors


JMIR Hum Factors 2019;6(3):e14819

DOI: 10.2196/14819

PMID: 31573897

PMCID: 6787527

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Postinjury Complications: Retrospective Study of Causative Factors


  • Elizabeth Warnack; 
  • Hersch Leon Pachter; 
  • Beatrix Choi; 
  • Charles DiMaggio; 
  • Spiros Frangos; 
  • Michael Klein; 
  • Marko Bukur

Background:

Injury care involves the complex interaction of patient, physician, and environment that impacts patient complications, level of harm, and failure to rescue (FTR). FTR represents the likelihood of a hospital to be unable to rescue patients from death after in-hospital complications.

Objective:

This study aimed to hypothesize that error type and number of errors contribute to increased level of harm and FTR.

Methods:

Patient information was abstracted from weekly trauma performance improvement (PI) records (from January 1, 2016, to July 19, 2017), where trauma surgeons determined the level of harm and identified the factors associated with complications. Level of harm was determined by definitions set forth by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Logistic regression was used to determine the impact of individual factors on FTR and level of harm, controlling for age, gender, Charlson score, injury severity score (ISS), error (in diagnosis, technique, or judgment), delay (in diagnosis or intervention), and need for surgery.

Results:

A total of 2216 trauma patients presented during the study period. Of 2216 patients, 224 (224/2216, 10.10 %) had complications reported at PI meetings; of these, 31 patients (31/224, 13.8 %) had FTR. PI patients were more likely to be older (mean age 51.3 years, SE 1.58, vs 46.5 years, SE 0.51; P=.008) and have higher ISS (median 22 vs 8; P<.001), compared with patients without complications. Physician-attributable errors (odds ratio [OR] 2.82; P=.001), most commonly errors in technique, and nature of injury (OR 1.91; P=.01) were associated with higher levels of harm, whereas delays in diagnosis or intervention were not. Each additional factor involved increased level of harm (OR 2.09; P<.001) and nearly doubled likelihood of FTR (OR 1.95; P=.01).

Conclusions:

Physician-attributable errors in diagnosis, technique, or judgment are more strongly correlated with harm than delays in diagnosis and intervention. Increasing number of errors identified in patient care correlates with an increasing level of harm and FTR.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Warnack E, Pachter HL, Choi B, DiMaggio C, Frangos S, Klein M, Bukur M

Postinjury Complications: Retrospective Study of Causative Factors


JMIR Hum Factors 2019;6(3):e14819

DOI: 10.2196/14819

PMID: 31573897

PMCID: 6787527

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.