Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Medical Informatics

Date Submitted: May 23, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: May 24, 2019 - May 31, 2019
Date Accepted: Jun 26, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Influence of Scribes on Patient-Physician Communication in Primary Care Encounters: Mixed Methods Study

Danak SU, Guetterman TC, Plegue MA, Holmstrom HL, Kadri R, Duthler A, Yoo A, Buis L

Influence of Scribes on Patient-Physician Communication in Primary Care Encounters: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Med Inform 2019;7(3):e14797

DOI: 10.2196/14797

PMID: 31298218

PMCID: 6657447

Documenting the Influence of Scribes on Patient-Physician Communication Within Primary Care Encounters: A Pilot Study

  • Shivang U Danak; 
  • Timothy C Guetterman; 
  • Melissa A Plegue; 
  • Heather L Holmstrom; 
  • Reema Kadri; 
  • Alex Duthler; 
  • Anne Yoo; 
  • Lorraine Buis

ABSTRACT

Background:

With the increased adoption of EHR systems, documentation-related burdens have been increasing for healthcare providers. Recent estimates indicate that primary care providers spend about one-half of their workday interacting with the EHR, of which about half is focused on clerical tasks. To reduce documentation burdens associated with the EHR, healthcare systems and physician practices are increasingly implementing medical scribes to assist providers with real-time documentation. Despite the promise of scribes, few studies have investigated their effect on the clinical encounters, particularly in regards to patient-provider communication.

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to understand how patient-physician communication in primary care clinical encounters was affected with and without the use of scribes.

Methods:

We employed a convergent mixed methods design among a sample of three physician-scribe pairs, and 34 patient participants randomly assigned to have a scribe present or not within a clinical encounter. We conducted patient surveys focused on perceptions of patient-provider communication and satisfaction with the encounter, video recorded clinical encounters, and conducted physician interviews about their experiences with scribes.

Results:

Overall, survey results revealed that patients across both arms reported very high satisfaction regarding communication with their physician, their physician’s use of the EHR, and their satisfaction with their care, with very little variability. Video recording analysis supported patient survey data by demonstrating physicians in scribed and non-scribed encounters both had high measures of communication. Furthermore, video recordings revealed that the presence of scribes had very little effect on the clinical encounter.

Conclusions:

From a patient perspective, scribes are an acceptable addition to clinical encounters. Although they do not have much impact on patient perceptions of satisfaction, and their impact on the clinical encounter itself was minimal, their potential to reduce documentation-related burden on physicians is important. Physicians noted important issues related to scribes, including important considerations for implementing scribe programs, the role of scribes in patient interactions, how physicians work with scribes, characteristics of good scribes, and the role of scribes in physician workflow.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Danak SU, Guetterman TC, Plegue MA, Holmstrom HL, Kadri R, Duthler A, Yoo A, Buis L

Influence of Scribes on Patient-Physician Communication in Primary Care Encounters: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Med Inform 2019;7(3):e14797

DOI: 10.2196/14797

PMID: 31298218

PMCID: 6657447

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.