Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Date Submitted: May 22, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: May 27, 2019 - Jun 15, 2019
Date Accepted: Jun 26, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
Development and Pilot Testing of Text Messages to Reduce Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake in Rural Caregivers and Adolescents: A Mixed-Methods Study
ABSTRACT
Background:
High consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) poses significant health concerns, particularly for rural adults and adolescents. Developing innovative strategies that target caregivers as the agents of change could be a promising way to improve both caregiver and adolescent health. Sending text messages through mobile phones has been cited as an effective way to improve behavioral outcomes, although little research has been conducted in rural areas, particularly focusing on SSB intake.
Objective:
Targeting rural caregivers, the objectives of this two phase study were to: 1) understand caregivers’ perceptions and language preferences for SSB-related text messages to inform and refine message development and delivery, and 2) evaluate the acceptability of text messages for SSB behavior change, and examine short-term effects on SSB behaviors.
Methods:
A convergent mixed-methods design was used to systematically develop and pilot test text messages with caregivers in Southwest Virginia. In phase one, five focus groups that included a card-sorting activity were conducted to explore advantages/disadvantages, language preferences (i.e., tone of voice, audience, phrase preferences), and perceived use of text messages. In phase two, caregivers participated in a 5-week text message pilot trial that included weekly educational and personalized strategy messages and SSB assessments at baseline and follow-up. Before the focus groups and after completing the pilot trial, caregivers also completed a pre-post survey that assessed SSB intake, SSB home availability, and caregiver SSB-related practices. Caregivers also completed individual follow-up telephone interviews following the pilot trial.
Results:
In phase one, caregivers (n=33) reported that text messages were convenient, accessible, and easy to read. Additionally, caregivers preferred messages with empathetic and authoritative tones of voice that provided useful strategies and stayed away from using absolute words (e.g., always, never). In the phase two pilot trial (n=30), 87% of caregivers completed baseline and 77% completed follow-up assessment suggesting a high utilization rate. Other ways caregivers reported benefiting from the text messages included sharing messages with family members, friends, and coworkers (80%), making mental notes (57%), and looking back at messages as reminders (50%). Caregivers reported significant improvements in home environment, parenting practices, and rulemaking around SSB (all P <0.05). Also, the frequency of SSB intake among caregivers and adolescents significantly decreased (P <0.01).
Conclusions:
Spending time in the formative phases of text message development helped to understand the unique perspectives and language preferences of the target population. This study also found that delivering an intervention through text messages has the potential to improve caregiver behaviors and reduce SSB intake in rural caregivers and adolescents. Findings from this study were used to develop a larger bank of text messages, which will be used in a future study testing the effectiveness of a text message intervention targeting SSB-related caregiver behaviors.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.