Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jul 3, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 8, 2019 - Aug 20, 2019
Date Accepted: Jan 24, 2020
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Effects of Interactivity on Recall of Health Information: Experimental Study

Pajor EM, Eggers SM, de Vries H, Oenema A

Effects of Interactivity on Recall of Health Information: Experimental Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(10):e14783

DOI: 10.2196/14783

PMID: 33112245

PMCID: 7657723

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Interactivity and recall of health information: Is less more? An Experimental Study

  • Emília Margit Pajor; 
  • Sander Matthijs Eggers; 
  • Hein de Vries; 
  • Anke Oenema

ABSTRACT

Background:

Information that is provided in an interactive way is believed to be engaging because users are provided with the possibility to actively explore the information. Yet empirical findings often contradict this assumption. Consequently, there is still little known about whether and how interactivity affects communication outcomes, such as recall.

Objective:

The aim of this study is to investigate mechanisms through which interactivity may affect recall of online health information. We tested whether and how cognitive involvement, perceived active control, and cognitive load mediates the effects of interactivity on recall. In addition, we examined need for cognition and health literacy as potential moderators of the mediation-effects.

Methods:

In an online between-subjects experiment (n=983), we manipulated the levels of interactivity by increasing the number of interactive features on a website: control condition (no interactive features), moderate interactivity (dropdown menu), and high interactivity (dropdown menu and responsive infographics). Participants were randomly assigned to one of the three conditions. Two weeks before the experiment, background characteristics and moderating variables were measured. In the actual experiment, pre- (control variables) and post exposure (outcomes) measures were applied. In addition, during website visit data on users’ online behavior was collected.

Results:

Moderate and high levels of interactivity decreased recall through lowered levels of cognitive involvement (Moderate interactivity: b=−.20; 95%CI −.31 to −.10; High interactivity: b=−.21, 95%CI −.33 to −.10), but increased recall through enhanced perceptions of active control (Moderate interactivity: b=.28, 95%CI .18 to .40, High interactivity: b=.27, 95%CI .16 to .40). The mediations found were partial since moderate (b=−2.25, 95%CI −2.59 to −1.90) and high interactivity (b=−2.16, 95%CI −2.51 to −1.81) had direct effects on recall as well. The mediation-effects of cognitive involvement and perceived active control were more prevalent in the high need for cognition and high health literate groups, as compared to their counterparts.

Conclusions:

From a cognitive resources perspective, results indicate that individuals tend to devote more resources to controlling the interactive website than to get involved with the content, especially those who are more motivated and skilled to process information.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Pajor EM, Eggers SM, de Vries H, Oenema A

Effects of Interactivity on Recall of Health Information: Experimental Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(10):e14783

DOI: 10.2196/14783

PMID: 33112245

PMCID: 7657723

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.