Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Submitted: May 13, 2019
Date Accepted: Jul 27, 2019
Cost-effectiveness of Therapist-Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Stress: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial
ABSTRACT
Background:
Chronic stress is associated with significant suffering, functional impairment and high societal costs. Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) is a promising treatment for stress-related disorders but has so far not been subjected to health-economic evaluation.
Objective:
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of ICBT for patients with stress-related disorders. We hypothesized that ICBT, compared to a waitlist control group (WLC), would generate improvements at low net costs, thereby making it cost-effective.
Methods:
Health-economic data were obtained in tandem with a randomized controlled trial of a 12-week ICBT in which patients were randomized to ICBT (n = 50) or to a waitlist control group (n = 50). Health outcomes and costs were surveyed pre- and post-treatment. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) based on remission rates (cost-effectiveness) and health-related quality of life (cost-utility), and used bootstrap sampling to assess the uncertainty of our results.
Results:
The cost-effectiveness ICER indicated that each patient in remission in ICBT relative to the WLC generated a societal cost saving of $158 pre- to post treatment. ICBT had a 60% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness to pay (WTP) of $0, and a 96% probability of being cost effective at a WTP of $1000. The cost-utility ICER also indicated that ICBT led to improvements in quality of life at no net societal cost. Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of our results.
Conclusions:
ICBT is indicated to be a cost-effective treatment for patients suffering from chronic stress. Compared to no treatment, ICBT for these patients seems to yield large effects at no or minimal societal net costs. Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02540317.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.