Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Apr 25, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 29, 2019 - Jun 24, 2019
Date Accepted: Feb 3, 2020
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

General Practitioners’ Perceptions of Whether Teleconsultations Reduce the Number of Face-to-face Visits in the Catalan Public Primary Care System: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

López Seguí F, Vidal-Alaball J, Sagarra Castro M, García Altés A, García Cuyàs F

General Practitioners’ Perceptions of Whether Teleconsultations Reduce the Number of Face-to-face Visits in the Catalan Public Primary Care System: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(3):e14478

DOI: 10.2196/14478

PMID: 32175914

PMCID: 7105927

Do teleconsultations between doctors and patients reduce the number of face-to-face visits? General Practitioners’ perceptions in the Catalan public primary care system

  • Francesc López Seguí; 
  • Josep Vidal-Alaball; 
  • Marta Sagarra Castro; 
  • Anna García Altés; 
  • Francesc García Cuyàs

ABSTRACT

Background:

eConsulta is a teleconsultation service between doctors and patients which is part of Catalonia’s public health system’s IT system. It has been in operation since the end of 2015 as a complement to the face-to-face consultations offered by the territory’s Primary Care Teams (PCTs) as one of the services offered in the Personal Health Folder.

Objective:

evaluate the relationship between the use of eConsulta and the number of face-to-face visits.

Methods:

18 professionals from the Central Catalonia Health Region retrospectively categorized the cases managed via eConsulta (2,268), according to 13 typologies proposed by the authors, and indicated whether, in their opinion, they served to reduce the number of face-to-face visits.

Results:

the most frequent use of the e-consultation was for the management of test results (33%), queries for clinical reasons (17%) and the management of repeat prescriptions (12%). On average the conversations consisted of 1.57 messages (45% were only one message, the rest were conversations of mostly two and up to five interactions), with the patient initiating the majority of said conversations (60%). There was a broad consensus among doctors that eConsulta has a very high capacity to resolve patient queries (avoiding the need for a face-to-face visit in 88% of cases) for every type of consultation.

Conclusions:

the use of eConsulta is strongly associated with the reducing the number of face-to-face visits and is shown as a useful tool to avoid interactions with little added clinical value. Clinical Trial: The study was approved by the Ethical Committee for Clinical Research at the Foundation University Institute for Primary Health Care Research Jordi Gol i Gurina, with registration number P18/023.


 Citation

Please cite as:

López Seguí F, Vidal-Alaball J, Sagarra Castro M, García Altés A, García Cuyàs F

General Practitioners’ Perceptions of Whether Teleconsultations Reduce the Number of Face-to-face Visits in the Catalan Public Primary Care System: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(3):e14478

DOI: 10.2196/14478

PMID: 32175914

PMCID: 7105927

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.