Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Apr 1, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 1, 2019 - May 27, 2019
Date Accepted: Oct 1, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Clinical Effectiveness of a Technology-Enabled Cardiac Rehabilitation Platform (Physical Activity Toward Health-I): Randomized Controlled Trial

Claes J, Cornelissen V, McDermott C, Moyna N, Pattyn N, Cornelis N, Gallagher A, McCormack C, Newton H, Gillain A, Budts W, Goetschalckx K, Woods C, Moran K, Buys R

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Clinical Effectiveness of a Technology-Enabled Cardiac Rehabilitation Platform (Physical Activity Toward Health-I): Randomized Controlled Trial

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(2):e14221

DOI: 10.2196/14221

PMID: 32014842

PMCID: 7055834

PATHway-I: Feasibility, acceptability and clinical effectiveness of a technology enabled cardiac rehabilitation platform. A randomized controlled trial.

  • Jomme Claes; 
  • Véronique Cornelissen; 
  • Clare McDermott; 
  • Niall Moyna; 
  • Nele Pattyn; 
  • Nils Cornelis; 
  • Ann Gallagher; 
  • Ciara McCormack; 
  • Helen Newton; 
  • Alexandra Gillain; 
  • Werner Budts; 
  • Kaatje Goetschalckx; 
  • Catherine Woods; 
  • Kieran Moran; 
  • Roselien Buys

ABSTRACT

Background:

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is highly effective as secondary prevention for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Uptake of CR remains suboptimal (30% of eligible patients) and long-term adherence to a physically active (PA) lifestyle is even lower. Innovative strategies are needed to counteract this phenomenon.

Objective:

We developed the PATHway system (Physical Activity Towards Health) to provide a comprehensive, remotely monitored home-based CR program for CVD patients. The PATHway-I study aimed to investigate its feasibility and clinical efficacy during phase III CR.

Methods:

Participants were randomized on a 1:1 basis to the PATHway intervention group (PW) or usual care control group (UC) in a Single-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled pilot trial. Outcomes were assessed at completion of phase II CR and six months follow-up. The primary outcome was PA (Actigraph GT9X link). Secondary outcomes included measures of physical fitness, modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, endothelial function, intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery and quality of life. System usability and patients' experiences were evaluated only in PW. A mixed-model ANOVA with Bonferroni adjustment was used to analyze between-group effects over time. Missing values were handled by means of an intention-to-treat analysis. Statistical significance was set at a two-sided alpha level of 0.05. Data are reported as mean ± SD.

Results:

A convenience sample of 120 CVD patients (61.4 ± 13.5 years, 22 women) was included. The PATHway system was deployed in the homes of 60 participants. System use decreased over time and system usability was average with a score of 65.7 ± 19.7 (range 5-100). Moderate to vigorous intensity PA increased in PW (PW: 127 ± 58 min to 141 ± 69 min, UC: 146 ± 66 min to 143 ± 71 min; p-interaction=0.039), while diastolic blood pressure (PW: 79 ± 11 to 79 ± 10 mmHg, UC: 78 ± 9 to 83 ± 10 mmHg; p-interaction=0.004) and cardiovascular risk score remained constant, but deteriorated in UC (PW: 15.9 ± 10.4 to 15.5 ± 10.5%, UC: 14.5 ± 9.7 to 15.7 ± 10.9%; p-interaction=0.004).

Conclusions:

This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of a technology-enabled, remotely monitored, home-based CR program. Although clinical effectiveness was demonstrated, several challenges were identified that could influence adoption of PATHway. Clinical Trial: This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02717806


 Citation

Please cite as:

Claes J, Cornelissen V, McDermott C, Moyna N, Pattyn N, Cornelis N, Gallagher A, McCormack C, Newton H, Gillain A, Budts W, Goetschalckx K, Woods C, Moran K, Buys R

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Clinical Effectiveness of a Technology-Enabled Cardiac Rehabilitation Platform (Physical Activity Toward Health-I): Randomized Controlled Trial

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(2):e14221

DOI: 10.2196/14221

PMID: 32014842

PMCID: 7055834

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.