Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Date Submitted: Mar 15, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 18, 2019 - May 13, 2019
Date Accepted: Mar 29, 2020
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Comparing a Social and Communication App, Telephone Intervention, and Usual Care for Diabetes Self-Management: 3-Arm Quasiexperimental Evaluation Study

Chiu CJ, Yu YC, Du YF, Yang YC, Chen JY, Wong LP, Tanasugarn C

Comparing a Social and Communication App, Telephone Intervention, and Usual Care for Diabetes Self-Management: 3-Arm Quasiexperimental Evaluation Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(6):e14024

DOI: 10.2196/14024

PMID: 32484448

PMCID: 7298636

Comparing social and communication apps, telephone, and usual care for diabetes self-management: A three arm quasi-experimental evaluation study

  • Ching-Ju Chiu; 
  • Yung-Chen Yu; 
  • Ye-Fong Du; 
  • Yi-Ching Yang; 
  • Jou-Yin Chen; 
  • Li-Ping Wong; 
  • Chanuantong Tanasugarn

ABSTRACT

Background:

There are many technology-assisted innovations used to address disease management. However, most of them are not broadly used by older adults due to their cost. Besides, disease management through the technology-assisted innovations does not compared with other interventions.

Objective:

This study tested the employment of a widely and freely used social and communication app for helping older adults with diabetes manage their distress and glycemic control. It also compared the effectiveness with two other methods, including telephone and conventional health education, and to determine which sub-group experiences the most effects within each intervention.

Methods:

Adults aged ≥50 with type 2 diabetes were recruited from Southern Taiwan (N=231) and were allocated to different 3-month interventions.

Results:

Informed consent was obtained at the Ministry of Science and Technology and approved by the National Cheng Kung University Hospital Institutional Review Board (No. A-ER-102-425). Participants in the mobile-based group had a significant reduction in hemoglobin A1C as compared with the telephone-based and usual care groups (mean change=-0.4, 0.1, 0.03, respectively, P=.02). Diabetes-specific distress reduced to a greater extent in the mobile-based group as compared to the other two groups (mean change=-5.16, -3.49, and -2.44, respectively, P=.02). Subgroup analyses further revealed that the effects on reducing blood glucose level in the social and communication app group was especially evident in those with lower distress scores, and diabetes-related distress was especially evident in those who aged less than 60 years or with higher educational levels, respectively.

Conclusions:

Findings from this study inform a more flexible use of social and communication apps in person with diabetes education and counselling. Clinical Trial: This study was approved by the Institution Review Board (IRB) of National Cheng Kung University Hospital in Taiwan (No. A-ER- 102-425). This study is identical with what the IRB assessed when providing approval before the trial started.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Chiu CJ, Yu YC, Du YF, Yang YC, Chen JY, Wong LP, Tanasugarn C

Comparing a Social and Communication App, Telephone Intervention, and Usual Care for Diabetes Self-Management: 3-Arm Quasiexperimental Evaluation Study

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;8(6):e14024

DOI: 10.2196/14024

PMID: 32484448

PMCID: 7298636

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.