Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Feb 26, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Mar 1, 2019 - Apr 10, 2019
Date Accepted: Apr 18, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

What Players of Virtual Reality Exercise Games Want: Thematic Analysis of Web-Based Reviews

Farič N, Potts HWW, Hon A, Smith L, Newby K, Steptoe A, Fisher A

What Players of Virtual Reality Exercise Games Want: Thematic Analysis of Web-Based Reviews

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(9):e13833

DOI: 10.2196/13833

PMID: 31538951

PMCID: 6754685

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

What Players of Virtual Reality Exercise Games Want: Thematic Analysis of Web-Based Reviews

  • Nuša Farič; 
  • Henry W W Potts; 
  • Adrian Hon; 
  • Lee Smith; 
  • Katie Newby; 
  • Andrew Steptoe; 
  • Abi Fisher

Background:

Physical activity (PA) is associated with a variety of physical and psychosocial health benefits, but levels of moderate-to-vigorous intensity PA remain low worldwide. Virtual reality (VR) gaming systems involving movement (VR exergames) could be used to engage people in more PA.

Objective:

This study aimed to synthesize public reviews of popular VR exergames to identify common features that players liked or disliked to inform future VR exergame design.

Methods:

We conducted a thematic analysis of 498 reviews of the 29 most popular exergames sold in the top 3 VR marketplaces: Steam (Valve Corporation), Viveport (Valve Corporation), and Oculus (Oculus VR). We categorized reviews as positive and negative as they appeared in the marketplaces and identified the most common themes using an inductive thematic analysis.

Results:

The reviews were often mixed, reporting a wide variety of expectations, preferences, and gaming experiences. Players preferred highly realistic games (eg, closely simulated real-world sport), games that were intuitive (in terms of body movement and controls), and games that provided gradual increases in skill acquisition. Players reported feeling that they reached a high level of exertion when playing and that the immersion distracted them from the intensity of the exercise. Some preferred features included music and social aspects of the games, with multiplayer options to include friends or receive help from experienced players. There were 3 main themes in negative reviews. The first concerned bugs that rendered games frustrating. Second, the quality of graphics had a particularly strong impact on perceived enjoyment. Finally, reviewers disliked when games had overly complex controls and display functions that evoked motion sickness.

Conclusions:

Exergames prove to be a stimulating avenue for players to engage in PA and distract themselves from the negative perceptions of performing exercise. The common negative aspects of VR exergames should be addressed for increased uptake and continued engagement.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Farič N, Potts HWW, Hon A, Smith L, Newby K, Steptoe A, Fisher A

What Players of Virtual Reality Exercise Games Want: Thematic Analysis of Web-Based Reviews

J Med Internet Res 2019;21(9):e13833

DOI: 10.2196/13833

PMID: 31538951

PMCID: 6754685

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.