Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Accepted for/Published in: JMIR Formative Research

Date Submitted: Feb 22, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 25, 2019 - Apr 22, 2019
Date Accepted: Aug 8, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

The final, peer-reviewed published version of this preprint can be found here:

Applicability of Different Electronic Record Types for Use in Patient Recruitment Support Systems: Comparative Analysis

Schreiweis B, Brandner A, Bergh B

Applicability of Different Electronic Record Types for Use in Patient Recruitment Support Systems: Comparative Analysis

JMIR Form Res 2021;5(9):e13790

DOI: 10.2196/13790

PMID: 34546175

PMCID: 8493461

Comparison of Electronic Record Types Concerning the Applicability for Patient Recruitment

  • Björn Schreiweis; 
  • Antje Brandner; 
  • Björn Bergh

ABSTRACT

Background:

Supporting recruitment of clinical trials using software tools integrated into medical care environments, so called patient recruitment systems (PRSs), recently increased. PRSs in literature are integrated in electronic medical records (EMRs), electronic health records (EHRs), and also personal health records (PHRs) integrating PRSs are mentioned. Further patient or medical records available are EHRs for distinct medical conditions (electronic medical case record (ECR); ger: Elektronische Fallakte) and personal electronic health records (PEHRs). But yet, the applicability of these different types of patient records for integration with PRSs has to be researched.

Objective:

Thus, this paper describes the different types of patient records and evaluates their applicability for integration with PRSs.

Methods:

Requirements on PRSs were gathered from literature and unstructured interviews with stakeholders in a previous study. These requirements were amended and afterwards evaluated by comparison to functionality and definition of EMR, EHR, ECR, PHR PEHR. Definitions of EMR, EHR, ECR, PHR and PEHR were taken from literature analysis concerning definitions of the record types.

Results:

All requirements could be partially met by at least one of these types of patient records. Only one requirement was fully met by all five types. According to the analysis PEHRs fulfill most requirements on PRSs. PEHRs especially fulfill patient empowerment and medical history integration requirements.

Conclusions:

PEHRs are the most applicable records, when it comes to integration with PRSs. Thus, PRS integration with PEHRs is worth further research. Clinical Trial: No trial has been performed.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Schreiweis B, Brandner A, Bergh B

Applicability of Different Electronic Record Types for Use in Patient Recruitment Support Systems: Comparative Analysis

JMIR Form Res 2021;5(9):e13790

DOI: 10.2196/13790

PMID: 34546175

PMCID: 8493461

Per the author's request the PDF is not available.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.